Recontextualizing Famous Quotes for Brand Slogan Generation
Ziao Yang, Zizhang Chen, Lei Zhang, Hongfu Liu
TL;DR
The paper tackles advertising slogan fatigue by introducing a paradigm that recontextualizes persona-related famous quotes for slogan generation. It presents a modular remix framework comprising quote matching, structure decomposition, vocabulary replacement, and remix generation, coupled with a short-text post-training step to bias the model toward slogan-length outputs. Evaluations across automatic diversity/novelty metrics and human judgments show improvements in variety, creativity, and emotional impact over strong LLM baselines, demonstrating better alignment with brand personas. The approach emphasizes interpretability and controllability, offering a scalable alternative to end-to-end slogan generation that leverages the depth of famous quotes while mitigating repetition and generic phrasing in real-world advertising systems.
Abstract
Slogans are concise and memorable catchphrases that play a crucial role in advertising by conveying brand identity and shaping public perception. However, advertising fatigue reduces the effectiveness of repeated slogans, creating a growing demand for novel, creative, and insightful slogan generation. While recent work leverages large language models (LLMs) for this task, existing approaches often produce stylistically redundant outputs that lack a clear brand persona and appear overtly machine-generated. We argue that effective slogans should balance novelty with familiarity and propose a new paradigm that recontextualizes persona-related famous quotes for slogan generation. Well-known quotes naturally align with slogan-length text, employ rich rhetorical devices, and offer depth and insight, making them a powerful resource for creative generation. Technically, we introduce a modular framework that decomposes slogan generation into interpretable subtasks, including quote matching, structural decomposition, vocabulary replacement, and remix generation. Extensive automatic and human evaluations demonstrate marginal improvements in diversity, novelty, emotional impact, and human preference over three state-of-the-art LLM baselines.
