V-Retrver: Evidence-Driven Agentic Reasoning for Universal Multimodal Retrieval
Dongyang Chen, Chaoyang Wang, Dezhao SU, Xi Xiao, Zeyu Zhang, Jing Xiong, Qing Li, Yuzhang Shang, Shichao Ka
TL;DR
V-Retrver tackles the limitation of language-only reasoning in universal multimodal retrieval by enabling an agentic reasoning loop that actively inspects visual evidence via external tools. It introduces Multimodal Interleaved Evidence Reasoning (MIER) and a three-stage curriculum-based training with an Evidence-Aligned Policy Optimization (EAPO) objective, including a composite reward $R_i = α\, r_{format}(o_i) + β\, r_{rank}(o_i) + r_{tool}(o_i)$. Empirically, it achieves state-of-the-art performance on the M-BEIR benchmark (average Recall $R@5=69.7$) and demonstrates strong generalization on unseen datasets, validating the effectiveness of grounded, interactive visual reasoning for retrieval. These results underscore the potential of agentic MLLMs to perform more precise, evidence-based multimodal reasoning, with practical impact on large-scale retrieval systems and downstream RAG-style tasks.
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been applied to universal multimodal retrieval, where Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves candidate reranking. However, existing approaches remain largely language-driven, relying on static visual encodings and lacking the ability to actively verify fine-grained visual evidence, which often leads to speculative reasoning in visually ambiguous cases. We propose V-Retrver, an evidence-driven retrieval framework that reformulates multimodal retrieval as an agentic reasoning process grounded in visual inspection. V-Retrver enables an MLLM to selectively acquire visual evidence during reasoning via external visual tools, performing a multimodal interleaved reasoning process that alternates between hypothesis generation and targeted visual verification.To train such an evidence-gathering retrieval agent, we adopt a curriculum-based learning strategy combining supervised reasoning activation, rejection-based refinement, and reinforcement learning with an evidence-aligned objective. Experiments across multiple multimodal retrieval benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in retrieval accuracy (with 23.0% improvements on average), perception-driven reasoning reliability, and generalization.
