Prompting Destiny: Negotiating Socialization and Growth in an LLM-Mediated Speculative Gameworld
Mandi Yang, Zhiqi Gao, Yibo Meng, Dongyijie Primo Pan
TL;DR
This work addresses how educational guidance and socialization shift across developmental stages and how to render these dynamics legible in AI-mediated play. It proposes a staged four-season socialization arc in an LLM-driven RPG with delayed end-of-stage feedback (anti-visualization) to promote reflective reasoning. An empirical study with N=12 participants uses reflexive thematic analysis to reveal how players negotiate responsibility, role positioning, and moral tension. The study offers design guidance for translating sociological socialization models into reflective AI-mediated game systems and discusses practical implications such as entry load and the use of reflective artifacts.
Abstract
We present an LLM-mediated role-playing game that supports reflection on socialization, moral responsibility, and educational role positioning. Grounded in socialization theory, the game follows a four-season structure in which players guide a child prince through morally charged situations and compare the LLM-mediated NPC's differentiated responses across stages, helping them reason about how educational guidance shifts with socialization. To approximate real educational contexts and reduce score-chasing, the system hides real-time evaluative scores and provides delayed, end-of-stage growth feedback as reflective prompts. We conducted a user study (N=12) with gameplay logs and post-game interviews, analyzed via reflexive thematic analysis. Findings show how players negotiated responsibility and role positioning, and reveal an entry-load tension between open-ended expression and sustained engagement. We contribute design knowledge on translating sociological models of socialization into reflective AI-mediated game systems.
