Quantum-Enhanced Deterministic Inference of $k$-Independent Set Instances on Neutral Atom Arrays
Juyoung Park, Junwoo Jung, Jaewook Ahn
TL;DR
This work introduces deterministic error mitigation (DEM) to translate noisy quantum optimization outputs into comparable, cost-aware benchmarks. By modeling measurement noise as a Hamming-shell around the ideal configuration, the authors derive an entropy-controlled postprocessing cost $T(N,p) \sim 2^{N H_2(p)}$ and extend it to asymmetric SPAM via an effective rate $p_{\mathrm{eff}}$. Experimental validation on neutral-atom MIS experiments shows that DEM costs scale with $H_2(p_{\mathrm{eff}})$ and can be lower than classical baselines, enabling hardware-vs-classical comparisons with hundreds of atoms at current error rates. Tarjan-DEM further corroborates the entropy-driven scaling under pruning, emphasizing that the leading cost is set by the noise-induced search space rather than graph geometry. Overall, DEM provides a rigorous, hardware-relevant framework for benchmarking quantum optimization against classical algorithms by normalizing solution quality and classical inference cost.
Abstract
Noisy quantum annealing experiments on Rydberg atom arrays produce measurement outcomes that deviate from ideal distributions, complicating performance evaluation. To enable a data-driven benchmarking methodology for quantum devices that accounts for both solution quality and the classical computational cost of inference from noisy measurements, we introduce deterministic error mitigation (DEM), a shot-level inference procedure informed by experimentally characterized noise. We demonstrate this approach using the decision version of the $k$-independent set problem. Within a Hamming-shell framework, the DEM candidate volume is governed by the binary entropy of the bit-flip error rate, yielding an entropy-controlled classical postprocessing cost. Using experimental measurement data, DEM reduces postprocessing overhead relative to classical inference baselines. Numerical simulations and experimental results from neutral atom devices validate the predicted scaling with system size and error rate. These scalings indicate that one hour of classical computation on an Intel i9 processor corresponds to neutral atom experiments with up to $N=250-450$ atoms at effective error rates, enabling a direct, cost-based comparison between noisy quantum experiments and classical algorithms.
