Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Learning fermionic linear optics with Heisenberg scaling and physical operations

Aria Christensen, Andrew Zhao

TL;DR

This work delivers efficient, physically realistic protocols for learning fermionic linear optics (FLO) with Heisenberg-scaling precision while respecting fermionic superselection and using minimal ancilla. It distinguishes active FLOs (Bogoliubov transformations in O(2n)) from passive FLOs (U(n)) and achieves $ ilde{O}(n^4/\varepsilon)$ queries for active FLOs and $O(n^3/\varepsilon)$ for passive FLOs, with the latter optionally reduced to $\tilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ using $n$ ancilla via Choi-state tomography. A core technical advance is the use of fermionic shadows (U$(n)$-shadows and SO$(2n)$-shadows) to perform efficient, isotropic state tomography of Slater determinants, enabling a copy complexity of $\tilde{O}(n\eta^2/\varepsilon^2)$ for $\eta$-particle Slaters and tighter bounds in the $\eta=1$ case. The paper also develops a bootstrap framework that turns a base constant-error tomography into a diamond-distance accurate FLO, achieving Heisenberg scaling in precision and providing improved methods for Gaussian-state tomography and phase estimation under superselection. Collectively, these results advance practical FLO learning and Gaussian-state tomography with parity-conserving, resource-efficient protocols that are compatible with experimental limitations.

Abstract

We revisit the problem of learning fermionic linear optics (FLO), also known as fermionic Gaussian unitaries. Given black-box query access to an unknown FLO, previous proposals required $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^5 / \varepsilon^2)$ queries, where $n$ is the system size and $\varepsilon$ is the error in diamond distance. These algorithms also use unphysical operations (i.e., violating fermionic superselection rules) and/or $n$ auxiliary modes to prepare Choi states of the FLO. In this work, we establish efficient and experimentally friendly protocols that obey superselection, use minimal ancilla (at most $1$ extra mode), and exhibit improved dependence on both parameters $n$ and $\varepsilon$. For arbitrary (active) FLOs this algorithm makes at most $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^4 / \varepsilon)$ queries, while for number-conserving (passive) FLOs we show that $\mathcal{O}(n^3 / \varepsilon)$ queries suffice. The complexity of the active case can be further reduced to $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^3 / \varepsilon)$ at the cost of using $n$ ancilla. This marks the first FLO learning algorithm that attains Heisenberg scaling in precision. As a side result, we also demonstrate an improved copy complexity of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n η^2 / \varepsilon^2)$ for time-efficient state tomography of $η$-particle Slater determinants in $\varepsilon$ trace distance, which may be of independent interest.

Learning fermionic linear optics with Heisenberg scaling and physical operations

TL;DR

This work delivers efficient, physically realistic protocols for learning fermionic linear optics (FLO) with Heisenberg-scaling precision while respecting fermionic superselection and using minimal ancilla. It distinguishes active FLOs (Bogoliubov transformations in O(2n)) from passive FLOs (U(n)) and achieves queries for active FLOs and for passive FLOs, with the latter optionally reduced to using ancilla via Choi-state tomography. A core technical advance is the use of fermionic shadows (U-shadows and SO-shadows) to perform efficient, isotropic state tomography of Slater determinants, enabling a copy complexity of for -particle Slaters and tighter bounds in the case. The paper also develops a bootstrap framework that turns a base constant-error tomography into a diamond-distance accurate FLO, achieving Heisenberg scaling in precision and providing improved methods for Gaussian-state tomography and phase estimation under superselection. Collectively, these results advance practical FLO learning and Gaussian-state tomography with parity-conserving, resource-efficient protocols that are compatible with experimental limitations.

Abstract

We revisit the problem of learning fermionic linear optics (FLO), also known as fermionic Gaussian unitaries. Given black-box query access to an unknown FLO, previous proposals required queries, where is the system size and is the error in diamond distance. These algorithms also use unphysical operations (i.e., violating fermionic superselection rules) and/or auxiliary modes to prepare Choi states of the FLO. In this work, we establish efficient and experimentally friendly protocols that obey superselection, use minimal ancilla (at most extra mode), and exhibit improved dependence on both parameters and . For arbitrary (active) FLOs this algorithm makes at most queries, while for number-conserving (passive) FLOs we show that queries suffice. The complexity of the active case can be further reduced to at the cost of using ancilla. This marks the first FLO learning algorithm that attains Heisenberg scaling in precision. As a side result, we also demonstrate an improved copy complexity of for time-efficient state tomography of -particle Slater determinants in trace distance, which may be of independent interest.
Paper Structure (46 sections, 42 theorems, 199 equations, 8 algorithms)

This paper contains 46 sections, 42 theorems, 199 equations, 8 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\Phi$ be an FLO. There exists an algorithm which makes $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^4 / \varepsilon)$ queries to $\Phi$ and uses $\mathrm{poly}(n, 1/\varepsilon)$ classical computational effort to output an efficient classical description of an FLO $\widehat{\bm{\Phi}}$ such that, with high proba Each experiment only requires Fock (standard basis) initial states, implements $\mathcal{O}(n^3 / \

Theorems & Definitions (105)

  • Theorem 1.1: Active FLO learner, \ref{['thm:active_alg_main']}
  • Remark 1.2: Ancilla-free prerequisites
  • Theorem 1.3: Passive FLO learner, \ref{['thm:passive_alg_main']}
  • Corollary 1.4: Passive FLO learner within number sectors
  • Theorem 1.5: Slater determinant tomography, \ref{['thm:slater_tomo_geq1', 'thm:slater_tomo_eq1']}
  • Claim 2.1: Normal form for skew-symmetric matrices
  • proof
  • Claim 2.2: Rounded matrix error
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3: Hoeffding hoeffding1963probability
  • ...and 95 more