AI-Based Detection of In-Treatment Changes from Prostate MR-Linac Images
Seungbin Park, Peilin Wang, Ryan Pennell, Emily S. Weg, Himanshu Nagar, Timothy McClure, Mert R. Sabuncu, Daniel Margolis, Heejong Kim
TL;DR
This study demonstrates that AI can detect treatment-induced changes in longitudinal MR-Linac prostate images by predicting the correct temporal order of fraction pairs. A Siamese 3D CNN within the LILAC framework achieves near-perfect discrimination ($AUC\approx0.99$) on post-treatment pairs and outperforms expert readers, with performance scaling with inter-fraction interval. Saliency and input-ablation analyses localize changes mainly to the prostate, bladder, and pubic symphysis, suggesting RT-induced anatomical and textural alterations; quantitative findings corroborate prostate enlargement and bladder contraction with darker, more heterogeneous prostate signals. These results indicate MR-Linac imaging, coupled with AI, can serve as a biomarker for in-treatment changes and potentially support adaptive radiotherapy and toxicity prediction.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether routinely acquired longitudinal MR-Linac images can be leveraged to characterize treatment-induced changes during radiotherapy, particularly subtle inter-fraction changes over short intervals (average of 2 days). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included a series of 0.35T MR-Linac images from 761 patients. An artificial intelligence (deep learning) model was used to characterize treatment-induced changes by predicting the temporal order of paired images. The model was first trained with the images from the first and the last fractions (F1-FL), then with all pairs (All-pairs). Model performance was assessed using quantitative metrics (accuracy and AUC), compared to a radiologist's performance, and qualitative analyses - the saliency map evaluation to investigate affected anatomical regions. Input ablation experiments were performed to identify the anatomical regions altered by radiotherapy. The radiologist conducted an additional task on partial images reconstructed by saliency map regions, reporting observations as well. Quantitative image analysis was conducted to investigate the results from the model and the radiologist. Results: The F1-FL model yielded near-perfect performance (AUC of 0.99), significantly outperforming the radiologist. The All-pairs model yielded an AUC of 0.97. This performance reflects therapy-induced changes, supported by the performance correlation to fraction intervals, ablation tests and expert's interpretation. Primary regions driving the predictions were prostate, bladder, and pubic symphysis. Conclusion: The model accurately predicts temporal order of MR-Linac fractions and detects radiation-induced changes over one or a few days, including prostate and adjacent organ alterations confirmed by experts. This underscores MR-Linac's potential for advanced image analysis beyond image guidance.
