Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Maneuverable-Jamming-Aided Secure Communication and Sensing in A2G-ISAC Systems

Libiao Lou, Yuan Liu, Fotis Foukalas, Hongjiang Lei, Gaofeng Pan, Theodoros A. Tsiftsis, Hongwu Liu

TL;DR

This work tackles secure communication and sensing in air-to-ground ISAC systems by deploying a maneuverable-jamming UAV alongside a source UAV in a hybrid radar setup. It introduces a two-phase optimization framework—secure communication (SC) and sensing-communication-sensing (SCS)—to balance competing objectives, and develops a BCD-based solution for SC leveraging SDR and trust-region SCA, plus a greedy sensing-location strategy and penalized beamforming for SCS. The proposed scheme demonstrates superior average secrecy rate ($ASR$) and robust sensing performance compared with benchmarks, while explicitly modeling residual interference from imperfect SIC. The results underscore the value of maneuverable jamming and dynamic dual-UAV coordination for enhancing PLS and ISAC capabilities in dynamic A2G environments.

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a maneuverablejamming-aided secure communication and sensing (SCS) scheme for an air-to-ground integrated sensing and communication (A2G-ISAC) system, where a dual-functional source UAV and a maneuverable jamming UAV operate collaboratively in a hybrid monostatic-bistatic radar configuration. The maneuverable jamming UAV emits artificial noise to assist the source UAV in detecting multiple ground targets while interfering with an eavesdropper. The effects of residual interference caused by imperfect successive interference cancellation on the received signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio are considered, which degrades the system performance. To maximize the average secrecy rate (ASR) under transmit power budget, UAV maneuvering constraints, and sensing requirements, the dual-UAV trajectory and beamforming are jointly optimized. Given that secure communication and sensing fundamentally conflict in terms of resource allocation, making it difficult to achieve optimal performance for both simultaneously, we adopt a two-phase design to address this challenge. By dividing the mission into the secure communication (SC) phase and the SCS phase, the A2G-ISAC system can focus on optimizing distinct objectives separately. In the SC phase, a block coordinate descent algorithm employing the trust-region successive convex approximation and semidefinite relaxation iteratively optimizes dual-UAV trajectory and beamforming. For the SCS phase, a weighted distance minimization problem determines the suitable dual-UAV sensing positions by a greedy algorithm, followed by the joint optimization of source beamforming and jamming beamforming. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves the highest ASR among benchmarks while maintaining robust sensing performance, and confirm the impact of the SIC residual interference on both secure communication and sensing.

Maneuverable-Jamming-Aided Secure Communication and Sensing in A2G-ISAC Systems

TL;DR

This work tackles secure communication and sensing in air-to-ground ISAC systems by deploying a maneuverable-jamming UAV alongside a source UAV in a hybrid radar setup. It introduces a two-phase optimization framework—secure communication (SC) and sensing-communication-sensing (SCS)—to balance competing objectives, and develops a BCD-based solution for SC leveraging SDR and trust-region SCA, plus a greedy sensing-location strategy and penalized beamforming for SCS. The proposed scheme demonstrates superior average secrecy rate () and robust sensing performance compared with benchmarks, while explicitly modeling residual interference from imperfect SIC. The results underscore the value of maneuverable jamming and dynamic dual-UAV coordination for enhancing PLS and ISAC capabilities in dynamic A2G environments.

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a maneuverablejamming-aided secure communication and sensing (SCS) scheme for an air-to-ground integrated sensing and communication (A2G-ISAC) system, where a dual-functional source UAV and a maneuverable jamming UAV operate collaboratively in a hybrid monostatic-bistatic radar configuration. The maneuverable jamming UAV emits artificial noise to assist the source UAV in detecting multiple ground targets while interfering with an eavesdropper. The effects of residual interference caused by imperfect successive interference cancellation on the received signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio are considered, which degrades the system performance. To maximize the average secrecy rate (ASR) under transmit power budget, UAV maneuvering constraints, and sensing requirements, the dual-UAV trajectory and beamforming are jointly optimized. Given that secure communication and sensing fundamentally conflict in terms of resource allocation, making it difficult to achieve optimal performance for both simultaneously, we adopt a two-phase design to address this challenge. By dividing the mission into the secure communication (SC) phase and the SCS phase, the A2G-ISAC system can focus on optimizing distinct objectives separately. In the SC phase, a block coordinate descent algorithm employing the trust-region successive convex approximation and semidefinite relaxation iteratively optimizes dual-UAV trajectory and beamforming. For the SCS phase, a weighted distance minimization problem determines the suitable dual-UAV sensing positions by a greedy algorithm, followed by the joint optimization of source beamforming and jamming beamforming. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves the highest ASR among benchmarks while maintaining robust sensing performance, and confirm the impact of the SIC residual interference on both secure communication and sensing.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 59 equations, 13 figures, 1 table, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 15 sections, 59 equations, 13 figures, 1 table, 2 algorithms.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: MJ-aided A2G-ISAC system model.
  • Figure 2: UAV trajectories obtained by different schemes in case $1$.
  • Figure 3: UAV trajectories obtained by different schemes in case $2$.
  • Figure 4: Selected time slot indices for target sensing in case $1$.
  • Figure 5: Secrecy rate at each time slot in case $1$.
  • ...and 8 more figures