Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Bivariate Hardy-Sobolev Inequality and Its Sharp Stability

Yingfang Zhang, Xuexiu Zhong, Wenming Zou

TL;DR

The paper develops a sharp, variational framework for a bivariate Hardy-Sobolev inequality on domains Ω ⊂ ℝ^N, establishing the best constant S_{α,β,λ,μ}(Ω) and a precise characterization of minimizers. For κ ≤ 0, the inequality reduces to a semitrivial combination of single-variable Hardy-Sobolev terms, while κ > 0 leads to a reduced problem involving a scalar t and the function g(t), yielding explicit forms for minimizers when Ω = ℝ^N. The authors prove a sharp stability estimate around the minimizers in ℝ^N, with the deficit controlling the gradient distance to the minimizers via an exponent ι that is 1 in nondegenerate cases and 1/2 in degenerate ones, and they provide a weighted extension through a suitable transformation. These results integrate spectral analysis, a detailed study of g(t), and a careful nonlinear analysis to deliver both the best constants and quantitative stability for the bivariate Hardy-Sobolev inequality, significantly advancing the theory beyond the univariate case.

Abstract

This paper establishes a bivariate Hardy-Sobolev inequality. Let $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^N$ ($N \geq 3$) be an open domain, $s \in (0,2)$, $α> 1$, $β> 1$ with $α+ β= 2^*(s)$, and $κ\in \mathbb{R}$. For any functions $u, v \in D_0^{1,2}(Ω)$, we prove the inequality: \begin{multline*} \int_Ω |\nabla u|^2 \, \mathrm{d}x + \int_Ω |\nabla v|^2 \, \mathrm{d}x \ge S_{α,β,λ,μ}(Ω) \left( \int_Ω \Big( λ\frac{|u|^{2^*(s)}}{|x|^s} + μ\frac{|v|^{2^*(s)}}{|x|^s} + 2^*(s) κ\frac{|u|^α|v|^β}{|x|^s} \Big)\, \mathrm{d}x \right)^{\frac{2}{2^*(s)}}. \end{multline*} We derive the best constant $S_{α,β,λ,μ}(Ω)$ and characterize the set of minimizers. Moreover, for $Ω= \mathbb{R}^N$ and $κ> 0$, we obtain sharp stability results for nonnegative functions.

Bivariate Hardy-Sobolev Inequality and Its Sharp Stability

TL;DR

The paper develops a sharp, variational framework for a bivariate Hardy-Sobolev inequality on domains Ω ⊂ ℝ^N, establishing the best constant S_{α,β,λ,μ}(Ω) and a precise characterization of minimizers. For κ ≤ 0, the inequality reduces to a semitrivial combination of single-variable Hardy-Sobolev terms, while κ > 0 leads to a reduced problem involving a scalar t and the function g(t), yielding explicit forms for minimizers when Ω = ℝ^N. The authors prove a sharp stability estimate around the minimizers in ℝ^N, with the deficit controlling the gradient distance to the minimizers via an exponent ι that is 1 in nondegenerate cases and 1/2 in degenerate ones, and they provide a weighted extension through a suitable transformation. These results integrate spectral analysis, a detailed study of g(t), and a careful nonlinear analysis to deliver both the best constants and quantitative stability for the bivariate Hardy-Sobolev inequality, significantly advancing the theory beyond the univariate case.

Abstract

This paper establishes a bivariate Hardy-Sobolev inequality. Let () be an open domain, , , with , and . For any functions , we prove the inequality: \begin{multline*} \int_Ω |\nabla u|^2 \, \mathrm{d}x + \int_Ω |\nabla v|^2 \, \mathrm{d}x \ge S_{α,β,λ,μ}(Ω) \left( \int_Ω \Big( λ\frac{|u|^{2^*(s)}}{|x|^s} + μ\frac{|v|^{2^*(s)}}{|x|^s} + 2^*(s) κ\frac{|u|^α|v|^β}{|x|^s} \Big)\, \mathrm{d}x \right)^{\frac{2}{2^*(s)}}. \end{multline*} We derive the best constant and characterize the set of minimizers. Moreover, for and , we obtain sharp stability results for nonnegative functions.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 15 theorems, 214 equations, 1 figure, 1 table)

This paper contains 11 sections, 15 theorems, 214 equations, 1 figure, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem A

There exists a constant $L = L(N,s) > 0$ such that for every $u \in D_{0}^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^N)$,

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Lemma \ref{['Lem2']} case (iii)

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem A
  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Corollary 1.1
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['mth1.2']}
  • Lemma 3.1
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.2
  • ...and 19 more