De-conflating Preference and Qualification: Constrained Dual-Perspective Reasoning for Job Recommendation with Large Language Models
Bryce Kan, Wei Yang, Emily Nguyen, Ganghui Yi, Bowen Yi, Chenxiao Yu, Yan Liu
TL;DR
This paper tackles the dual-perspective nature of job matching, where candidate preference and employer qualification must be reconciled. It introduces JobRec, a framework that uses the Unified Semantic Alignment Schema (USAS) to symmetrically encode candidate and job attributes across four layers, and a Two-Stage Cooperative Training with a Lagrangian-based policy alignment to decouple and optimize preference and qualification under explicit eligibility constraints. A synthetic, expert-refined dataset is constructed to provide reliable dual-perspective supervision, enabling robust evaluation. Experimental results on a CS-domain benchmark show JobRec outperforms both LLM-based baselines and general deep recommenders, with strong gains in qualification ranking and controllable trade-offs via the eligibility threshold. The work demonstrates that explicit de-conflation and policy-aware ranking can significantly improve both the relevance and feasibility of job recommendations, offering practical benefits for policy control and fairer, more effective recruitment systems.
Abstract
Professional job recommendation involves a complex bipartite matching process that must reconcile a candidate's subjective preference with an employer's objective qualification. While Large Language Models (LLMs) are well-suited for modeling the rich semantics of resumes and job descriptions, existing paradigms often collapse these two decision dimensions into a single interaction signal, yielding confounded supervision under recruitment-funnel censoring and limiting policy controllability. To address these challenges, We propose JobRec, a generative job recommendation framework for de-conflating preference and qualification via constrained dual-perspective reasoning. JobRec introduces a Unified Semantic Alignment Schema that aligns candidate and job attributes into structured semantic layers, and a Two-Stage Cooperative Training Strategy that learns decoupled experts to separately infer preference and qualification. Building on these experts, a Lagrangian-based Policy Alignment module optimizes recommendations under explicit eligibility requirements, enabling controllable trade-offs. To mitigate data scarcity, we construct a synthetic dataset refined by experts. Experiments show that JobRec consistently outperforms strong baselines and provides improved controllability for strategy-aware professional matching.
