Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Obstruction theory and the complexity of counting group homomorphisms

Eric Samperton, Armin Weiß

TL;DR

The paper investigates the computational complexity of counting homomorphisms to a fixed finite group $G$ from a variable input group $\Gamma$, emphasizing how the encoding of $\Gamma$ drives complexity. It proves a dichotomy: if $\Gamma$ is given by a finite presentation, the problem is $\#\mathsf{P}$-complete for non-abelian $G$ but solvable in polynomial time for abelian $G$, with corollaries extending hardness to restricted input classes such as RAAGs and certain small-cancellation or finite nilpotent inputs. In contrast, when $G$ is class-2 nilpotent and $\Gamma=\pi_1(M^3)$ for a triangulated 3-manifold, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to compute $\#\mathrm{Hom}(\pi_1(M^3),G)$ by reducing obstruction problems to cohomology, aided by preprocessing that converts the manifold to an Eilenberg–MacLane space. The approach blends a $\#\mathrm{CSP}$ framework (via the ternary relation $T_G$ and Mal’tsev polymorphisms), obstruction theory in group cohomology, and HQFT/Clem preprocessing results to handle 3-manifold inputs, with implications for topological quantum computation through 3-manifold invariants.

Abstract

Fix a finite group $G$. We study the computational complexity of counting problems of the following flavor: given a group $Γ$, count the number of homomorphisms $Γ\to G$. Our first result establishes that this problem is $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard whenever $G$ is a non-abelian group and $Γ$ is provided via a finite presentation. We give several improvements showing that this hardness conclusion continues to hold for restricted $Γ$ satisfying various promises. Our second result, in contrast, shows that if $G$ is class 2 nilpotent and $Γ= π_1(M^3)$ for some input 3-manifold triangulation $M^3$, then there is a polynomial time algorithm. The difference in complexity is explained by the fact that 3-manifolds are close enough to being Eilenberg-MacLane spaces for us to be able to solve the necessary group cohomological obstruction problems efficiently using the given triangulation. A similar polynomial time algorithm for counting maps to finite, class 2 nilpotent $G$ exists when $Γ$ is itself a finite group encoded via a multiplication table.

Obstruction theory and the complexity of counting group homomorphisms

TL;DR

The paper investigates the computational complexity of counting homomorphisms to a fixed finite group from a variable input group , emphasizing how the encoding of drives complexity. It proves a dichotomy: if is given by a finite presentation, the problem is -complete for non-abelian but solvable in polynomial time for abelian , with corollaries extending hardness to restricted input classes such as RAAGs and certain small-cancellation or finite nilpotent inputs. In contrast, when is class-2 nilpotent and for a triangulated 3-manifold, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to compute by reducing obstruction problems to cohomology, aided by preprocessing that converts the manifold to an Eilenberg–MacLane space. The approach blends a framework (via the ternary relation and Mal’tsev polymorphisms), obstruction theory in group cohomology, and HQFT/Clem preprocessing results to handle 3-manifold inputs, with implications for topological quantum computation through 3-manifold invariants.

Abstract

Fix a finite group . We study the computational complexity of counting problems of the following flavor: given a group , count the number of homomorphisms . Our first result establishes that this problem is -hard whenever is a non-abelian group and is provided via a finite presentation. We give several improvements showing that this hardness conclusion continues to hold for restricted satisfying various promises. Our second result, in contrast, shows that if is class 2 nilpotent and for some input 3-manifold triangulation , then there is a polynomial time algorithm. The difference in complexity is explained by the fact that 3-manifolds are close enough to being Eilenberg-MacLane spaces for us to be able to solve the necessary group cohomological obstruction problems efficiently using the given triangulation. A similar polynomial time algorithm for counting maps to finite, class 2 nilpotent exists when is itself a finite group encoded via a multiplication table.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 12 theorems, 32 equations)

This paper contains 17 sections, 12 theorems, 32 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Fix a finite group $G$. The counting problem that takes a finitely presented group $\Gamma$ to the number of homomorphisms $\#\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits(\Gamma,G)$ is $\#\mathsf{P}$-complete via Turing reduction if and only if $G$ is nonabelian. If $G$ is abelian, then the problem is in $\mathsf

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 1.1.1
  • Theorem 2
  • Corollary 1.3.1
  • Lemma 2.1.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2.1: Thm. 5 of BulatovDalmau:dichotomy
  • Lemma 2.3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4.1
  • ...and 7 more