Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Graph-Augmented Reasoning with Large Language Models for Tobacco Pest and Disease Management

Siyu Li, Chenwei Song, Qi Zhou, Wan Zhou, Xinyi Liu

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of domain-grounded reasoning for tobacco pest and disease management by integrating a domain knowledge graph with a large language model through a GraphRAG-style pipeline. It constructs a tobacco-specific graph, learns entity and relation representations with TransE and refines them via a Graph Convolutional Network, and fuses query-focused graph evidence into a Transformer-based generator to produce evidence-aware recommendations. Experimental results show consistent improvements over text-only baselines and other RAG variants, with the largest gains on multi-hop and comparative queries that require chaining symptom–disease–treatment relations. The approach demonstrates that explicitly modeling relational structure can enhances reliability and practical applicability of agricultural decision-support systems.

Abstract

This paper proposes a graph-augmented reasoning framework for tobacco pest and disease management that integrates structured domain knowledge into large language models. Building on GraphRAG, we construct a domain-specific knowledge graph and retrieve query-relevant subgraphs to provide relational evidence during answer generation. The framework adopts ChatGLM as the Transformer backbone with LoRA-based parameter-efficient fine-tuning, and employs a graph neural network to learn node representations that capture symptom-disease-treatment dependencies. By explicitly modeling diseases, symptoms, pesticides, and control measures as linked entities, the system supports evidence-aware retrieval beyond surface-level text similarity. Retrieved graph evidence is incorporated into the LLM input to guide generation toward domain-consistent recommendations and to mitigate hallucinated or inappropriate treatments. Experimental results show consistent improvements over text-only baselines, with the largest gains observed on multi-hop and comparative reasoning questions that require chaining multiple relations.

Graph-Augmented Reasoning with Large Language Models for Tobacco Pest and Disease Management

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of domain-grounded reasoning for tobacco pest and disease management by integrating a domain knowledge graph with a large language model through a GraphRAG-style pipeline. It constructs a tobacco-specific graph, learns entity and relation representations with TransE and refines them via a Graph Convolutional Network, and fuses query-focused graph evidence into a Transformer-based generator to produce evidence-aware recommendations. Experimental results show consistent improvements over text-only baselines and other RAG variants, with the largest gains on multi-hop and comparative queries that require chaining symptom–disease–treatment relations. The approach demonstrates that explicitly modeling relational structure can enhances reliability and practical applicability of agricultural decision-support systems.

Abstract

This paper proposes a graph-augmented reasoning framework for tobacco pest and disease management that integrates structured domain knowledge into large language models. Building on GraphRAG, we construct a domain-specific knowledge graph and retrieve query-relevant subgraphs to provide relational evidence during answer generation. The framework adopts ChatGLM as the Transformer backbone with LoRA-based parameter-efficient fine-tuning, and employs a graph neural network to learn node representations that capture symptom-disease-treatment dependencies. By explicitly modeling diseases, symptoms, pesticides, and control measures as linked entities, the system supports evidence-aware retrieval beyond surface-level text similarity. Retrieved graph evidence is incorporated into the LLM input to guide generation toward domain-consistent recommendations and to mitigate hallucinated or inappropriate treatments. Experimental results show consistent improvements over text-only baselines, with the largest gains observed on multi-hop and comparative reasoning questions that require chaining multiple relations.
Paper Structure (18 sections, 8 equations, 1 table)