Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Interaction-induced moiré lattices: from mosaic mobility edges to many-body localization

Yan-Hao Yang, Zhihao Xu, Lei Ying, Qizhong Zhu

Abstract

We study localization driven solely by interparticle interactions in moiré lattice systems without intrinsic disorder or externally imposed quasiperiodic potentials. We consider a one-dimensional bilayer with incommensurate lattice constants, described by a spin-dependent Fermi-Hubbard-type model with short-range interlayer interactions, where quasiperiodicity emerges only through interactions. Exact diagonalization shows that quenching hopping in one layer generates an interaction-induced mosaic potential with multiple mobility edges. When both layers are dynamical, increasing interlayer interactions drives transitions among ergodic, critical, and many-body localized regimes, with energy-dependent coexistence in certain parameter ranges. An exact mapping to a noninteracting single-particle model on a higher-dimensional structured graph provides a unified interpretation of these results and suggests an experimentally accessible route to interaction-induced moiré physics and localization.

Interaction-induced moiré lattices: from mosaic mobility edges to many-body localization

Abstract

We study localization driven solely by interparticle interactions in moiré lattice systems without intrinsic disorder or externally imposed quasiperiodic potentials. We consider a one-dimensional bilayer with incommensurate lattice constants, described by a spin-dependent Fermi-Hubbard-type model with short-range interlayer interactions, where quasiperiodicity emerges only through interactions. Exact diagonalization shows that quenching hopping in one layer generates an interaction-induced mosaic potential with multiple mobility edges. When both layers are dynamical, increasing interlayer interactions drives transitions among ergodic, critical, and many-body localized regimes, with energy-dependent coexistence in certain parameter ranges. An exact mapping to a noninteracting single-particle model on a higher-dimensional structured graph provides a unified interpretation of these results and suggests an experimentally accessible route to interaction-induced moiré physics and localization.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 13 equations, 8 figures)

This paper contains 6 sections, 13 equations, 8 figures.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Schematic of the bilayer lattice model for $N_{\uparrow}=4$ on a lattice of size $L_{\uparrow}=10$ and $N_{\downarrow}=13$ on a lattice of size $L_{\downarrow}=16$. Particles hop between nearest-neighbor sites within each layer, while the two layers are coupled through short-range interlayer density-density interactions.
  • Figure 2: Dependence of the dimensionless interaction strength and band-gap ratio on the lattice depth parameter $s$. The left (blue) axis shows $G_{\uparrow\downarrow}/J$ as a function of $s$, while the right (orange) axis shows the ratio of the single-particle band gap $\Delta E$ (between the first and second bands) to $G_{\uparrow\downarrow}$. The latter quantifies the separation of the lowest band from higher bands and is used to justify the single-band approximation in the parameter regime considered.
  • Figure 3: The figure shows the interaction-induced effective potential $V_i^{\mathrm{eff}}$ (in unit of $J_{\uparrow}$) experienced by the upper-layer particle for regular fillings of the lower layer with $s=23$. The panels (a), (b) and (c) correspond to $\lambda=1$, $\lambda=2$ and $\lambda=3$, respectively. Insets show a magnified view of $V_i^{\mathrm{eff}}$ over lattice sites $i\in[0,100]$, highlighting the mosaic-like envelope of the quasiperiodic potential. Unit filling ($\lambda=1$) yields a dense but modulated envelope, while $\lambda\ge2$ produces a progressively diluted mosaic pattern.
  • Figure 4: Phase diagrams in the quenched-layer (mosaic) limit with $N_{\uparrow}=1$ and $J_{\downarrow}=0$. The vertical axis shows the single-particle eigenenergy $E$ of the upper layer in units of $J_{\uparrow}$. In all panels, $L_{\uparrow}=900$. Panels (a), (b) and (c) correspond to regular (mosaic) fillings in the lower layer with $N_{\downarrow}/L_{\downarrow}=1$ ($\lambda=1$), $N_{\downarrow}/L_{\downarrow}=1/2$ ($\lambda=2$) and $N_{\downarrow}/L_{\downarrow}=1/3$ ($\lambda=3$), respectively. Panel (d) shows the corresponding phase diagram for an average filling of $N_{\downarrow}/L_{\downarrow}=1/3$ with random configuration in the lower layer. The color indicates the fractal dimension $\Gamma$ of the eigenstates (blue: localized, $\Gamma\!\approx\!0$; yellow: extended, $\Gamma\!\approx\!1$), revealing multiple mobility edges for the regular fillings and their disappearance for random fillings.
  • Figure 5: Phase diagrams under different filling conditions. Panels (a)--(d) correspond to $N_{\uparrow}/L_{\uparrow}=2/16,\,4/16,\,15/16,\\\,14/16$ and $N_{\downarrow}/L_{\downarrow}=2/26,\,25/26,\,3/26,\,24/26$, respectively. Yellow indicates the ergodic (thermal) regime, light blue denotes an intermediate (critical) regime, and dark blue indicates the MBL regime. The colorbar shows the participation coefficient $a_1$.
  • ...and 3 more figures