Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Propagating the prior from far to near offset: A self-supervised diffusion framework for progressively recovering near-offsets of towed-streamer data

Shijun Cheng, Tariq Alkhalifah

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of missing near-offset traces in marine towed-streamer data by introducing a self-supervised diffusion framework that learns offset-dependent wavefield priors from available far-offset recordings. It trains a conditional diffusion model using overlapping far-offset patches to approximate the conditional distribution $p(x_0|y)$ without near-offset ground truth, and performs trace-by-trace recursive inference with DDIM sampling to propagate priors toward zero offset. The method includes uncertainty quantification via ensemble sampling, offering reliable quality assessment in real deployments where ground truth is unavailable. Across synthetic and field datasets, it outperforms the traditional parabolic Radon transform, demonstrates AVO-consistent reconstructions, and proves viable for real-world near-offset gap filling, with uncertainty maps guiding reliability and processing decisions.

Abstract

In marine towed-streamer seismic acquisition, the nearest hydrophone is often two hundred meter away from the source resulting in missing near-offset traces, which degrades critical processing workflows such as surface-related multiple elimination, velocity analysis, and full-waveform inversion. Existing reconstruction methods, like transform-domain interpolation, often produce kinematic inconsistencies and amplitude distortions, while supervised deep learning approaches require complete ground-truth near-offset data that are unavailable in realistic acquisition scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose a self-supervised diffusion-based framework that reconstructs missing near-offset traces without requiring near-offset reference data. Our method leverages overlapping patch extraction with single-trace shifts from the available far-offset section to train a conditional diffusion model, which learns offset-dependent statistical patterns governing event curvature, amplitude variation, and wavelet characteristics. At inference, we perform trace-by-trace recursive extrapolation from the nearest recorded offset toward zero offset, progressively propagating learned prior information from far to near offsets. The generative formulation further provides uncertainty estimates via ensemble sampling, quantifying prediction confidence where validation data are absent. Controlled validation experiments on synthetic and field datasets show substantial performance gains over conventional parabolic Radon transform baselines. Operational deployment on actual near-offset gaps demonstrates practical viability where ground-truth validation is impossible. Notably, the reconstructed waveforms preserve realistic amplitude-versus-offset trends despite training exclusively on far-offset observations, and uncertainty maps accurately identify challenging extrapolation regions.

Propagating the prior from far to near offset: A self-supervised diffusion framework for progressively recovering near-offsets of towed-streamer data

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of missing near-offset traces in marine towed-streamer data by introducing a self-supervised diffusion framework that learns offset-dependent wavefield priors from available far-offset recordings. It trains a conditional diffusion model using overlapping far-offset patches to approximate the conditional distribution without near-offset ground truth, and performs trace-by-trace recursive inference with DDIM sampling to propagate priors toward zero offset. The method includes uncertainty quantification via ensemble sampling, offering reliable quality assessment in real deployments where ground truth is unavailable. Across synthetic and field datasets, it outperforms the traditional parabolic Radon transform, demonstrates AVO-consistent reconstructions, and proves viable for real-world near-offset gap filling, with uncertainty maps guiding reliability and processing decisions.

Abstract

In marine towed-streamer seismic acquisition, the nearest hydrophone is often two hundred meter away from the source resulting in missing near-offset traces, which degrades critical processing workflows such as surface-related multiple elimination, velocity analysis, and full-waveform inversion. Existing reconstruction methods, like transform-domain interpolation, often produce kinematic inconsistencies and amplitude distortions, while supervised deep learning approaches require complete ground-truth near-offset data that are unavailable in realistic acquisition scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose a self-supervised diffusion-based framework that reconstructs missing near-offset traces without requiring near-offset reference data. Our method leverages overlapping patch extraction with single-trace shifts from the available far-offset section to train a conditional diffusion model, which learns offset-dependent statistical patterns governing event curvature, amplitude variation, and wavelet characteristics. At inference, we perform trace-by-trace recursive extrapolation from the nearest recorded offset toward zero offset, progressively propagating learned prior information from far to near offsets. The generative formulation further provides uncertainty estimates via ensemble sampling, quantifying prediction confidence where validation data are absent. Controlled validation experiments on synthetic and field datasets show substantial performance gains over conventional parabolic Radon transform baselines. Operational deployment on actual near-offset gaps demonstrates practical viability where ground-truth validation is impossible. Notably, the reconstructed waveforms preserve realistic amplitude-versus-offset trends despite training exclusively on far-offset observations, and uncertainty maps accurately identify challenging extrapolation regions.
Paper Structure (20 sections, 16 equations, 16 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 20 sections, 16 equations, 16 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of near-offset reconstruction results on synthetic data. The 101 traces closest to zero offset (0-1 km) are displayed. (a) Complete ground-truth shot gather. Reconstruction data by (b) the PRT and (c) our method. (d) Incomplete observed data with the first 10 near-offset traces removed. Reconstruction error (difference from ground truth) of (e) the PRT and (f) our method.
  • Figure 2: Frequency-wavenumber (F-K) spectra comparison for the near-offset reconstruction on synthetic data. (a) F-K spectra of the complete ground-truth data. F-K spectra of the reconstruction data corresponding to (b) the PRT and (c) our method. Spectra error (difference from ground truth) of (d) the PRT and (e) our method.
  • Figure 3: Waveform comparison of reconstructed near-offset traces on synthetic data. Blue solid lines represent ground-truth waveforms, and orange dashed lines represent reconstructed waveforms. (a1-a5) Comparison of the 10th, 7th, 5th, 3rd, and 1st reconstructed traces (from far to near offset) obtained by PRT with ground truth. (b1-b5) Corresponding comparisons for our method.
  • Figure 4: Near-offset reconstruction results on the field data from northwest Australia for validation purposes. The 101 traces closest to zero offset are displayed. (a) Complete ground-truth (recorded traces starting from $\sim$150 m offset). Reconstruction data of 10 removed traces for validation purposes by (b) the PRT and (c) our method. (d) Incomplete data (10 traces artificially removed from recorded portion for validation). Reconstruction error (difference from ground truth) of (e) the PRT and (f) our method.
  • Figure 5: F-K spectra comparison for field data I (northwest Australia) validation experiment. (a) F-K spectra of the ground-truth data (from recorded traces). F-K spectra of the reconstruction data corresponding to (b) the PRT and (c) our method. Spectra error (difference from ground truth) of (d) the PRT and (e) our method.
  • ...and 11 more figures