DCD: Decomposition-based Causal Discovery from Autocorrelated and Non-Stationary Temporal Data
Muhammad Hasan Ferdous, Md Osman Gani
TL;DR
The paper tackles causal discovery in non-stationary, autocorrelated multivariate time series by decomposing each series into trend, seasonal, and residual components and performing component-specific causal analysis before integrating results into a unified multi-scale graph. It formalizes identifiability guarantees under a set of assumptions, including spectral separability and a bounded leakage term within a Linear Gaussian SEM, and provides empirical validation on synthetic and real-world climate data showing improved recovery and interpretability over baselines. The decomposition-based framework isolates long-term and short-term causal effects, reducing spurious edges and yielding domain-consistent insights across finance, climate science, and healthcare. This approach enhances the reliability and interpretability of causal inferences in complex temporal systems and offers a pathway to bridging time series forecasting with causal discovery.
Abstract
Multivariate time series in domains such as finance, climate science, and healthcare often exhibit long-term trends, seasonal patterns, and short-term fluctuations, complicating causal inference under non-stationarity and autocorrelation. Existing causal discovery methods typically operate on raw observations, making them vulnerable to spurious edges and misattributed temporal dependencies. We introduce a decomposition-based causal discovery framework that separates each time series into trend, seasonal, and residual components and performs component-specific causal analysis. Trend components are assessed using stationarity tests, seasonal components using kernel-based dependence measures, and residual components using constraint-based causal discovery. The resulting component-level graphs are integrated into a unified multi-scale causal structure. This approach isolates long- and short-range causal effects, reduces spurious associations, and improves interpretability. Across extensive synthetic benchmarks and real-world climate data, our framework more accurately recovers ground-truth causal structure than state-of-the-art baselines, particularly under strong non-stationarity and temporal autocorrelation.
