Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Optimal Budgeted Adaptation of Large Language Models

Jing Wang, Jie Shen, Dean Foster, Zohar Karnin, Jeremy C Weiss

TL;DR

This work proposes a principled framework for budget-aware supervised fine-tuning by casting LLM adaptation as a contextual Stackelberg game, and incorporates a finite supervision budget directly into the learning objective.

Abstract

The trade-off between labeled data availability and downstream accuracy remains a central challenge in fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). We propose a principled framework for \emph{budget-aware supervised fine-tuning} by casting LLM adaptation as a contextual Stackelberg game. In our formulation, the learner (leader) commits to a scoring policy and a label-querying strategy, while an adaptive environment (follower) selects challenging supervised alternatives in response. To explicitly address label efficiency, we incorporate a finite supervision budget directly into the learning objective. Our algorithm operates in the full-feedback regime and achieves $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{T})$ regret under standard linear contextual assumptions. We extend the framework with a Largest-Latency-First (LLF) confidence gate that selectively queries labels, achieving a budget-aware regret bound of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{dB} + c\sqrt{B})$ with $B=βT$.

Optimal Budgeted Adaptation of Large Language Models

TL;DR

This work proposes a principled framework for budget-aware supervised fine-tuning by casting LLM adaptation as a contextual Stackelberg game, and incorporates a finite supervision budget directly into the learning objective.

Abstract

The trade-off between labeled data availability and downstream accuracy remains a central challenge in fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). We propose a principled framework for \emph{budget-aware supervised fine-tuning} by casting LLM adaptation as a contextual Stackelberg game. In our formulation, the learner (leader) commits to a scoring policy and a label-querying strategy, while an adaptive environment (follower) selects challenging supervised alternatives in response. To explicitly address label efficiency, we incorporate a finite supervision budget directly into the learning objective. Our algorithm operates in the full-feedback regime and achieves regret under standard linear contextual assumptions. We extend the framework with a Largest-Latency-First (LLF) confidence gate that selectively queries labels, achieving a budget-aware regret bound of with .
Paper Structure (47 sections, 2 theorems, 21 equations, 9 tables, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 47 sections, 2 theorems, 21 equations, 9 tables, 2 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Under Assumptions assump:linear--assump:subgaussian, with probability at least $1-\delta$, the cumulative regret of the full-feedback optimistic learner satisfies

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Theorem 1: Regret under full feedback
  • proof
  • Theorem 2: Regret under LLF budgeted gating
  • proof