Table of Contents
Fetching ...

RMFlow: Refined Mean Flow by a Noise-Injection Step for Multimodal Generation

Yuhao Huang, Shih-Hsin Wang, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Bao Wang

TL;DR

RMFlow addresses the quality gap of 1-NFE MeanFlow by introducing a noise-injection refinement after a coarse 1-NFE transport. It derives a joint training objective that combines Wasserstein-path alignment with likelihood maximization, enabling principled control of the learned distribution via a bound on $\mathbb{E}[\log p_{\theta}(\mathbf{x}_{\text{tgt}})]$ and a negative log-likelihood term $\mathcal{L}_{\rm NLL}$. The approach supports multimodal generation through a conditioning encoder and a small perturbation prior, while employing memory-efficient fine-tuning for scalability. Empirically, RMFlow achieves near-state-of-the-art performance across text-to-image, context-to-molecule, and time-series tasks using only 1-NFE, with computational cost comparable to baseline MeanFlows and potential for further improvements with larger budgets.

Abstract

Mean flow (MeanFlow) enables efficient, high-fidelity image generation, yet its single-function evaluation (1-NFE) generation often cannot yield compelling results. We address this issue by introducing RMFlow, an efficient multimodal generative model that integrates a coarse 1-NFE MeanFlow transport with a subsequent tailored noise-injection refinement step. RMFlow approximates the average velocity of the flow path using a neural network trained with a new loss function that balances minimizing the Wasserstein distance between probability paths and maximizing sample likelihood. RMFlow achieves near state-of-the-art results on text-to-image, context-to-molecule, and time-series generation using only 1-NFE, at a computational cost comparable to the baseline MeanFlows.

RMFlow: Refined Mean Flow by a Noise-Injection Step for Multimodal Generation

TL;DR

RMFlow addresses the quality gap of 1-NFE MeanFlow by introducing a noise-injection refinement after a coarse 1-NFE transport. It derives a joint training objective that combines Wasserstein-path alignment with likelihood maximization, enabling principled control of the learned distribution via a bound on and a negative log-likelihood term . The approach supports multimodal generation through a conditioning encoder and a small perturbation prior, while employing memory-efficient fine-tuning for scalability. Empirically, RMFlow achieves near-state-of-the-art performance across text-to-image, context-to-molecule, and time-series tasks using only 1-NFE, with computational cost comparable to baseline MeanFlows and potential for further improvements with larger budgets.

Abstract

Mean flow (MeanFlow) enables efficient, high-fidelity image generation, yet its single-function evaluation (1-NFE) generation often cannot yield compelling results. We address this issue by introducing RMFlow, an efficient multimodal generative model that integrates a coarse 1-NFE MeanFlow transport with a subsequent tailored noise-injection refinement step. RMFlow approximates the average velocity of the flow path using a neural network trained with a new loss function that balances minimizing the Wasserstein distance between probability paths and maximizing sample likelihood. RMFlow achieves near state-of-the-art results on text-to-image, context-to-molecule, and time-series generation using only 1-NFE, at a computational cost comparable to the baseline MeanFlows.
Paper Structure (33 sections, 3 theorems, 28 equations, 5 figures, 14 tables)

This paper contains 33 sections, 3 theorems, 28 equations, 5 figures, 14 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

[boffi2025build] There exists a constant $M > 0$ such that: where $M$ is a constant, $W^2_2(p_{\rm tgt}, p_\theta)$ denotes the Wasserstein distance between $p_{\rm tgt}$ and $p_\theta$, and $\Pi(p_{\rm tgt}, p_\theta)$ is the set of all joint distributions with marginals $p_{\rm tgt}$ and $p_\theta$.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Contrasting MeanFlow with RMFlow for mixture Gaussian sampling; see Section \ref{['subsec:density-estimation']} for experimental details and more results.
  • Figure 2: Contrasting MeanFlow with RMFlow, under the same context, for QM9 molecule generation.
  • Figure 3: Schematic of our proposed RMFlow: it first applies 1-NFE MeanFlow transport, then refines the result by a subsequent noise-injection step; see Section \ref{['sec:model-design']}. The average velocity $\hat{{\bm{u}}}_{0,1}({\bm{x}}_0;\theta)$ of RMFlow is trained by incorporating the maximum likelihood objective into the MeanFlow framework, as in equation \ref{['eq:RMFlow-objective']}.
  • Figure 4: A few randomly selected RMFlow-generated molecules, together with the corresponding contexts.
  • Figure 5: COCO dataset samples generated using 1-NFE RMFlow conditioned on different input prompts.

Theorems & Definitions (6)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • Remark 1
  • Theorem 4.1
  • Remark 2
  • Theorem A.1
  • proof : proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:KL']}