Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Toward Reliable Sim-to-Real Predictability for MoE-based Robust Quadrupedal Locomotion

Tianyang Wu, Hanwei Guo, Yuhang Wang, Junshu Yang, Xinyang Sui, Jiayi Xie, Xingyu Chen, Zeyang Liu, Xuguang Lan

TL;DR

We address the sim-to-real transfer challenge in proprioception-only quadrupedal locomotion by coupling a Mixture-of-Experts latent representation with RoboGauge, a predictive, sim-to-sim transfer framework. The MoE policy is trained within a Concurrent Teacher-Student regime and evaluated across diverse terrains, while RoboGauge provides six proprioception-based metrics across seven terrains with domain randomization to quantify transferability and guide policy selection. Physical deployment on a Unitree Go2 demonstrates robust performance on unseen terrains, high-speed capability up to 4 m/s, and an emergent narrow-width gait, outperforming baseline methods. This framework reduces hardware risk, accelerates deployment, and offers a scalable path toward broader morphologies and perception-enhanced control.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning has shown strong promise for quadrupedal agile locomotion, even with proprioception-only sensing. In practice, however, sim-to-real gap and reward overfitting in complex terrains can produce policies that fail to transfer, while physical validation remains risky and inefficient. To address these challenges, we introduce a unified framework encompassing a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) locomotion policy for robust multi-terrain representation with RoboGauge, a predictive assessment suite that quantifies sim-to-real transferability. The MoE policy employs a gated set of specialist experts to decompose latent terrain and command modeling, achieving superior deployment robustness and generalization via proprioception alone. RoboGauge further provides multi-dimensional proprioception-based metrics via sim-to-sim tests over terrains, difficulty levels, and domain randomizations, enabling reliable MoE policy selection without extensive physical trials. Experiments on a Unitree Go2 demonstrate robust locomotion on unseen challenging terrains, including snow, sand, stairs, slopes, and 30 cm obstacles. In dedicated high-speed tests, the robot reaches 4 m/s and exhibits an emergent narrow-width gait associated with improved stability at high velocity.

Toward Reliable Sim-to-Real Predictability for MoE-based Robust Quadrupedal Locomotion

TL;DR

We address the sim-to-real transfer challenge in proprioception-only quadrupedal locomotion by coupling a Mixture-of-Experts latent representation with RoboGauge, a predictive, sim-to-sim transfer framework. The MoE policy is trained within a Concurrent Teacher-Student regime and evaluated across diverse terrains, while RoboGauge provides six proprioception-based metrics across seven terrains with domain randomization to quantify transferability and guide policy selection. Physical deployment on a Unitree Go2 demonstrates robust performance on unseen terrains, high-speed capability up to 4 m/s, and an emergent narrow-width gait, outperforming baseline methods. This framework reduces hardware risk, accelerates deployment, and offers a scalable path toward broader morphologies and perception-enhanced control.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning has shown strong promise for quadrupedal agile locomotion, even with proprioception-only sensing. In practice, however, sim-to-real gap and reward overfitting in complex terrains can produce policies that fail to transfer, while physical validation remains risky and inefficient. To address these challenges, we introduce a unified framework encompassing a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) locomotion policy for robust multi-terrain representation with RoboGauge, a predictive assessment suite that quantifies sim-to-real transferability. The MoE policy employs a gated set of specialist experts to decompose latent terrain and command modeling, achieving superior deployment robustness and generalization via proprioception alone. RoboGauge further provides multi-dimensional proprioception-based metrics via sim-to-sim tests over terrains, difficulty levels, and domain randomizations, enabling reliable MoE policy selection without extensive physical trials. Experiments on a Unitree Go2 demonstrate robust locomotion on unseen challenging terrains, including snow, sand, stairs, slopes, and 30 cm obstacles. In dedicated high-speed tests, the robot reaches 4 m/s and exhibits an emergent narrow-width gait associated with improved stability at high velocity.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 11 equations, 18 figures, 13 tables)

This paper contains 29 sections, 11 equations, 18 figures, 13 tables.

Figures (18)

  • Figure 1: Our proposed framework integrates a Mixture-of-Experts architecture for terrain and command representation with the RoboGauge assessment suite to quantify sim-to-real transferability through sim-to-sim metrics. This closed-loop design enables reliable policy selection to facilitate robust deployment for agile locomotion across diverse challenging environments based solely on proprioception.
  • Figure 2: Comparative analysis against one-stage proprioceptive methods including CTS, HIM, and DreamWaQ. Within the RoboGauge framework, each axis reflects average performance on a specific terrain and serves as a reliable proxy to quantify sim-to-real capability. Our architecture consistently outperforms or matches previous state-of-the-art across all evaluated terrains under RoboGauge's metrics.
  • Figure 3: The RoboGauge evaluation architecture consists of three hierarchical stages. (A) Base Pipeline serves as a single evaluation environment by incorporating specific terrains and domain randomization. (B) Multi/Level Pipeline highlights the Multi/Level Pipeline where parallel evaluations across diverse random seeds. (C) Stress Pipeline depicts the Stress Pipeline which triggers comprehensive testing across the entire terrain suite to synthesize the final score.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of RoboGauge scores and terrain level curves across various baselines during training. Stable RoboGauge scores despite fluctuating terrain levels demonstrate that training levels fails to accurately represent model performance.
  • Figure 5: Comparison of maximum terrain levels across varying friction coefficients as evaluated by RoboGauge.
  • ...and 13 more figures