Predictive Maintenance for Ultrafiltration Membranes Using Explainable Similarity-Based Prognostics
Qusai Khaled, Laura Genga, Uzay Kaymak
TL;DR
The paper tackles UF membrane predictive maintenance by addressing the interpretability gap of traditional ML approaches. It introduces an explainable fuzzy similarity prognostic framework that builds a physics-informed Health Index from metrics like $R_m^*$, TMP$^*$, $J^*$, and Recovery, then fuzzifies these into Gaussian memberships to create a 120-dimensional degradation signature. Similar historical trajectories are retrieved via a set-theoretic fuzzy similarity and combined using a Takagi–Sugeno rule base to produce a RUL estimate: $ ext{RUL ext{_hat}} = ( ext{sum}_i S(q,s_i) r_i)/( ext{sum}_i S(q,s_i))$. The method demonstrates about 4 cycles MAE on industrial UF data, with best performance in the 6–15 cycle horizon, and provides interpretable rules that directly tie predictions to past degradation cases, all while requiring only four hydraulic sensors. This combination of accuracy and transparency supports actionable maintenance planning in desalination pretreatment and can be extended to other membrane processes such as RO and microfiltration.
Abstract
In reverse osmosis desalination, ultrafiltration (UF) membranes degrade due to fouling, leading to performance loss and costly downtime. Most plants rely on scheduled preventive maintenance, since existing predictive maintenance models, often based on opaque machine learning methods, lack interpretability and operator trust. This study proposes an explainable prognostic framework for UF membrane remaining useful life (RUL) estimation using fuzzy similarity reasoning. A physics-informed Health Index, derived from transmembrane pressure, flux, and resistance, captures degradation dynamics, which are then fuzzified via Gaussian membership functions. Using a similarity measure, the model identifies historical degradation trajectories resembling the current state and formulates RUL predictions as Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy rules. Each rule corresponds to a historical exemplar and contributes to a transparent, similarity-weighted RUL estimate. Tested on 12,528 operational cycles from an industrial-scale UF system, the framework achieved a mean absolute error of 4.50 cycles, while generating interpretable rule bases consistent with expert understanding.
