DecompressionLM: Deterministic, Diagnostic, and Zero-Shot Concept Graph Extraction from Language Models
Zhaochen Hong, Jiaxuan You
TL;DR
DecompressionLM tackles the challenge of exhaustively uncovering what language models know by moving beyond pre-defined prompts and sequential, stateful probing. It combines deterministic Van der Corput low-discrepancy sampling with arithmetic decoding to generate independent, parallel sequences that reveal a domain-specific concept graph, including edges inferred from co-occurrence. The method exposes how model quantization shapes knowledge breadth, showing AWQ-4bit preserves or expands concept coverage while other 4-bit schemes can fragment the knowledge graph, often without being reflected in perplexity. Corpus-grounded validation demonstrates that a majority of extracted concepts correspond to real legal documents, and that higher benchmark scores correlate with lower hallucination rates, underscoring the practical value of concept coverage as a diagnostic dimension for compressed models. Overall, DecompressionLM provides a principled, scalable, and interpretable framework for evaluating knowledge diversity and factual grounding in LLMs, with implications for deployment and benchmarking beyond traditional perplexity metrics.
Abstract
Existing knowledge probing methods rely on pre-defined queries, limiting extraction to known concepts. We introduce DecompressionLM, a stateless framework for zero-shot concept graph extraction that discovers what language models encode without pre-specified queries or shared cross-sequence state. Our method targets three limitations of common decoding-based probing approaches: cross-sequence coupling that concentrates probability mass on high-frequency prefixes, competitive decoding effects that suppress long-tail concepts, and scalability constraints arising from sequential exploration. Using Van der Corput low-discrepancy sequences with arithmetic decoding, DecompressionLM enables deterministic, embarrassingly parallel generation without shared state across sequences. Across two model families and five quantization variants, we find that activation-aware quantization (AWQ-4bit) expands concept coverage by 30-170%, while uniform quantization (GPTQ-Int4) induces 71-86% coverage collapse -- divergent behaviors not reliably reflected by explanation-level perplexity. Corpus-based verification further reveals a 17-point hallucination gap between top- and bottom-ranked MMLU-Pro Law models. DecompressionLM establishes concept coverage as a complementary evaluation dimension for assessing knowledge breadth and factual grounding in compressed models useful for their deployment.
