Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Understanding multiscale disorder in superconducting nanowire single photon detectors

Nirjhar Sarkar, Ronan Gourgues, Yueh-Chun Wu, Chengyun Hua, Katyayani Seal, Andreas Fognini, Steven Randolph, Eugene Dumitrescu, Gabor B. Halasz, Benjamin Lawrie

Abstract

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors are central to applications across quantum information science. Yet, their performance is limited by the effects of disorder and electrodynamic inhomogeneities that are not well understood. By combining DC transport, dark-count measurements, and bias-dependent microwave transmission spectroscopy in the presence of controlled nanoscale disorder introduced through helium-ion irradiation, we distinguish local instability-driven processes from intrinsic superconducting depairing and kinetic inductance nonlinearities. This approach enables systematic tuning of kinetic inductance, depairing currents, microwave dissipation, and mode structure within a single device. Bias- and temperature-dependent resonance shifts quantify disorder-induced modifications of the superconducting density of states through the nonlinear kinetic inductance, while the emergence of multiple resonant modes reveals the formation of electrodynamically distinct superconducting regions. Comparing depairing under current, field, and temperature isolates the dominant microwave loss mechanisms, separating vortex, quasiparticle, and two-level-system contributions, thus providing a robust multifunctional foundation for disorder engineering of superconducting nanowire detectors and resonators.

Understanding multiscale disorder in superconducting nanowire single photon detectors

Abstract

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors are central to applications across quantum information science. Yet, their performance is limited by the effects of disorder and electrodynamic inhomogeneities that are not well understood. By combining DC transport, dark-count measurements, and bias-dependent microwave transmission spectroscopy in the presence of controlled nanoscale disorder introduced through helium-ion irradiation, we distinguish local instability-driven processes from intrinsic superconducting depairing and kinetic inductance nonlinearities. This approach enables systematic tuning of kinetic inductance, depairing currents, microwave dissipation, and mode structure within a single device. Bias- and temperature-dependent resonance shifts quantify disorder-induced modifications of the superconducting density of states through the nonlinear kinetic inductance, while the emergence of multiple resonant modes reveals the formation of electrodynamically distinct superconducting regions. Comparing depairing under current, field, and temperature isolates the dominant microwave loss mechanisms, separating vortex, quasiparticle, and two-level-system contributions, thus providing a robust multifunctional foundation for disorder engineering of superconducting nanowire detectors and resonators.
Paper Structure (2 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 2 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Helium ion microscope image of a NbTiN SNSPD with the locally irradiated region indicated by a red dashed circle. The ion fluences used in this work are 50 and 150 ions/nm$^2$. All ion implantation was performed at 30 keV.
  • Figure 2: Three characteristic current scales for the same SNSPD extracted from different measurements. (a) DC I–V characteristics at 2 K (blue), 3 K (purple), and 4 K (red), showing a first local switching event near $\approx2~\mu$A; the dashed black curve is the 2 K I–V measurement after helium-ion implantation ($150~\mathrm{ions}/\mathrm{nm}^{2}$). The left inset illustrates a hotspot at nanowire bends near $I_{\mathrm{SW}}$. (b) Dark-count rate versus bias current for the same temperatures and color scheme: solid curves (non-irradiated) show onsets at $\approx$ 10, 8, and 6 $\mu$A, while dashed, semi-transparent curves (locally disordered $150~\mathrm{ions}/\mathrm{nm}^{2}$) show reduced onsets at $\approx$ 6, 3, and 1 $\mu$A. (c) Microwave transmission $|S_{12}|$ versus frequency at 4 K for different bias currents. The resonant peak shifts to a lower frequency and becomes strongly damped near $\approx25~\mu$A. The highly damped resonance was tracked clearly in the phase response shown in the left inset. Together, these 3 measurements probe distinct aspects of the device physics.
  • Figure 3: Bias- and temperature-dependent kinetic inductance of disordered SNSPDs. (a) Normalized kinetic inductance $L_k(I,T)/L_k(0,T)$ extracted from the resonance frequency $f_0(I,T)$ shown in the inset, using $L_k \propto 1/f_0^2$. (b) Extracted depairing current versus temperature obtained by fitting the data in (a) using the Clem--Kogan fast-relaxation model for SNSPDs with different irradiation fluences.
  • Figure 4: Local helium ion irradiation creates two superconducting regions with distinct microwave resonances. Microwave transmission spectra $|S_{12}|$ for devices irradiated at 0, 50, and 150 ions/nm$^{2}$ in (a), (b), and (c) for variable temperature illustrated by the shared color bar in (c). Increasing helium ion doses progressively broaden and then split the resonance into two distinct modes. (d) Bias-dependent resonance frequencies extracted from the microwave spectra for all irradiation doses. The 150 ions/nm$^{2}$ device exhibits two well-separated branches across the full bias range, while the 50 ions/nm$^{2}$ device shows bias-induced convergence and merging of the two branches. (e) Extracted depairing current versus temperature for each branch, indicating that the low-frequency resonance has a lower depairing current corresponding to the disordered superconducting region. (f) Resonance detuning $\Delta f_{\mathrm{meas}}(I)=f_{\mathrm{hi}}-f_{\mathrm{lo}}$ extracted for both 150 and 50 ions.
  • Figure 5: Depairing with bias current, magnetic field, and temperature. Microwave transmission $|S_{12}|$ spectra of the non-irradiated device as a function of (a) dc bias current at $8$ K, (b) perpendicular magnetic field at $8$ K, and (c) temperature. Increasing bias current, temperature or field shifts the resonance to lower frequency. The left and right insets show the extracted $Q$ and $f_0$ (in GHz) versus bias current (in $\mu\mathrm{A}$), field (in T), and temperature (in K), respectively, with axis limits adjusted to highlight optimal contrast between non-irradiated and 150 ions/nm$^{2}$ irradiated devices.