Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On polynomial functors and polynomial comonads over infinity groupoids

Kun Chen

TL;DR

This work develops polynomial functors over the $\infty$-category $\mathcal{S}$ of $\infty$-groupoids, showing that such single-variable polynomials are colimits of representables indexed by $\infty$-groupoids and establishing the bicompleteness of $Poly_{\mathcal{S}}$. It introduces a monoidal structure on $Poly_{\mathcal{S}}$ via composition and defines polynomial comonads as comonoid objects, aiming to connect these to complete Segal spaces and to generalize the classical Ahman-Uustalu correspondence to the $\infty$-categorical setting. The paper provides explicit constructions for the composition and coclosure, analyzes mapping spaces between polynomials, and develops a décalage-like functor to build augmented cosimplicial structures from comonoids. A partial but substantive result shows that comonoids yield augmented cosimplicial spaces with Segal-type properties, offering a concrete path toward a higher-categorical analogue of the Ahman-Uustalu theorem and a potential bridge to complete Segal spaces.

Abstract

We show that single-variable polynomial functors over the category $\mathcal{S}$ of infinity groupoids, as defined by Gepner-Haugseng-Kock, are exactly colimits of representable copresheaves indexed by infinity groupoid. This allows us to establish certain categorical properties of the $\infty$-category $Poly_{\mathcal{S}}$, in parallel with the case of the ordinary category $Poly$. We define the notion of polynomial comonad under the monoidal structure of $Poly_{\mathcal{S}}$ induced by composition of polynomials, and describe a construction toward exploring the connection between polynomial comonads and complete Segal spaces. This construction partially generalizes the classical one given in the proof of a theorem of Ahman-Uustalu.

On polynomial functors and polynomial comonads over infinity groupoids

TL;DR

This work develops polynomial functors over the -category of -groupoids, showing that such single-variable polynomials are colimits of representables indexed by -groupoids and establishing the bicompleteness of . It introduces a monoidal structure on via composition and defines polynomial comonads as comonoid objects, aiming to connect these to complete Segal spaces and to generalize the classical Ahman-Uustalu correspondence to the -categorical setting. The paper provides explicit constructions for the composition and coclosure, analyzes mapping spaces between polynomials, and develops a décalage-like functor to build augmented cosimplicial structures from comonoids. A partial but substantive result shows that comonoids yield augmented cosimplicial spaces with Segal-type properties, offering a concrete path toward a higher-categorical analogue of the Ahman-Uustalu theorem and a potential bridge to complete Segal spaces.

Abstract

We show that single-variable polynomial functors over the category of infinity groupoids, as defined by Gepner-Haugseng-Kock, are exactly colimits of representable copresheaves indexed by infinity groupoid. This allows us to establish certain categorical properties of the -category , in parallel with the case of the ordinary category . We define the notion of polynomial comonad under the monoidal structure of induced by composition of polynomials, and describe a construction toward exploring the connection between polynomial comonads and complete Segal spaces. This construction partially generalizes the classical one given in the proof of a theorem of Ahman-Uustalu.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 18 theorems, 62 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 21 sections, 18 theorems, 62 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

For $B\in\mathcal{S}$, given a functor $p:B\rightarrow\mathcal{S}$ viewed as a diagram indexed by $B$, let $E\rightarrow B$ be the unstraightening $Un_B(p)$ of $p$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Self compositions of a polynomial

Theorems & Definitions (52)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Corollary 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Remark 2.4
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Remark 2.6
  • Definition 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • ...and 42 more