Table of Contents
Fetching ...

DC-LA: Difference-of-Convex Langevin Algorithm

Hoang Phuc Hau Luu, Zhongjian Wang

TL;DR

The paper addresses sampling from a nonconvex, nonsmooth DC-regularized Gibbs distribution $\pi \propto e^{-V}$ with $V=f+(r_1-r_2)$, where $f$ is Lipschitz-smooth and $r_i$ are convex. It proposes DC-LA, a forward-backward Langevin algorithm that uses Moreau envelopes $r_1^{\lambda}$ and $r_2^{\lambda}$ to form an augmented potential $V_{\lambda}$ and a practical update, with an unrolled form linking $Y_k$ and $X_k$ through proximal steps. Theoretical contributions establish convergence in $q$-Wasserstein distance to $\pi$ (up to discretization and smoothing) under distant dissipativity, for both nonsmooth and smooth variants of $r_2$, and for a range of regularity regimes. Empirically, DC-LA yields faithful posterior distributions and meaningful uncertainty quantification in synthetic experiments and in CT reconstruction with data-driven DC priors, outperforming baselines on density fidelity and variance visualization. Overall, the work extends non-log-concave sampling to non-weakly-convex DC regularizers, providing a robust, theoretically-grounded tool for high-dimensional Bayesian inference and imaging applications.

Abstract

We study a sampling problem whose target distribution is $π\propto \exp(-f-r)$ where the data fidelity term $f$ is Lipschitz smooth while the regularizer term $r=r_1-r_2$ is a non-smooth difference-of-convex (DC) function, i.e., $r_1,r_2$ are convex. By leveraging the DC structure of $r$, we can smooth out $r$ by applying Moreau envelopes to $r_1$ and $r_2$ separately. In line of DC programming, we then redistribute the concave part of the regularizer to the data fidelity and study its corresponding proximal Langevin algorithm (termed DC-LA). We establish convergence of DC-LA to the target distribution $π$, up to discretization and smoothing errors, in the $q$-Wasserstein distance for all $q \in \mathbb{N}^*$, under the assumption that $V$ is distant dissipative. Our results improve previous work on non-log-concave sampling in terms of a more general framework and assumptions. Numerical experiments show that DC-LA produces accurate distributions in synthetic settings and reliably provides uncertainty quantification in a real-world Computed Tomography application.

DC-LA: Difference-of-Convex Langevin Algorithm

TL;DR

The paper addresses sampling from a nonconvex, nonsmooth DC-regularized Gibbs distribution with , where is Lipschitz-smooth and are convex. It proposes DC-LA, a forward-backward Langevin algorithm that uses Moreau envelopes and to form an augmented potential and a practical update, with an unrolled form linking and through proximal steps. Theoretical contributions establish convergence in -Wasserstein distance to (up to discretization and smoothing) under distant dissipativity, for both nonsmooth and smooth variants of , and for a range of regularity regimes. Empirically, DC-LA yields faithful posterior distributions and meaningful uncertainty quantification in synthetic experiments and in CT reconstruction with data-driven DC priors, outperforming baselines on density fidelity and variance visualization. Overall, the work extends non-log-concave sampling to non-weakly-convex DC regularizers, providing a robust, theoretically-grounded tool for high-dimensional Bayesian inference and imaging applications.

Abstract

We study a sampling problem whose target distribution is where the data fidelity term is Lipschitz smooth while the regularizer term is a non-smooth difference-of-convex (DC) function, i.e., are convex. By leveraging the DC structure of , we can smooth out by applying Moreau envelopes to and separately. In line of DC programming, we then redistribute the concave part of the regularizer to the data fidelity and study its corresponding proximal Langevin algorithm (termed DC-LA). We establish convergence of DC-LA to the target distribution , up to discretization and smoothing errors, in the -Wasserstein distance for all , under the assumption that is distant dissipative. Our results improve previous work on non-log-concave sampling in terms of a more general framework and assumptions. Numerical experiments show that DC-LA produces accurate distributions in synthetic settings and reliably provides uncertainty quantification in a real-world Computed Tomography application.
Paper Structure (55 sections, 10 theorems, 193 equations, 15 figures)

This paper contains 55 sections, 10 theorems, 193 equations, 15 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $g$ be a convex function and $\lambda>0$. The following properties hold

Figures (15)

  • Figure 1: Target density and histograms of samples produced by ULA, Moreau ULA, PSGLA and DC-LA
  • Figure 2: Binned KL divergences between samples from ULA, Moreau ULA, PSGLA, and DC-LA and the target distributions
  • Figure 3: CT reconstruction results. DC-LA mean achieves SSIM 0.8493 and PSNR 26.2109. PSM MAP with iterations: 2k (SSIM 0.7586, PSNR 24.2803), 10k (SSIM 0.8488, PSNR 26.2498), 20k (SSIM 0.8501, PSNR 26.5246).
  • Figure 4: Plot of $\mathop{\mathrm{Prox}}\nolimits_{-\vert \cdot \vert}$
  • Figure 5: $\Sigma=1001$, mutiple chains
  • ...and 10 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (15)

  • Lemma 1
  • Remark 2
  • Remark 3
  • Lemma 4
  • Lemma 5
  • Lemma 6
  • Theorem 7
  • Theorem 8
  • Theorem 9
  • Lemma 10
  • ...and 5 more