Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rigidity of circle polyhedra and hyperideal polyhedra: the tangency case

John C. Bowers, Philip L. Bowers, Carl O. R. Lutz

TL;DR

This work extends global rigidity for proper triangulated convex hyperbolic circle polyhedra on the sphere to include tangency between neighboring vertex-disks, thereby generalizing the Koebe–Andre'ev–Thurston framework. It develops an extended notion of properness, adapts Minkowski/de Sitter geometry to the circle-polyhedron setting, and uses a deformation-and-limit strategy that bypasses the non-unitary obstruction previously required. Central to the approach is the inversive-measure map on the configuration space, which, under strict convexity, has full rank, enabling local-to-global rigidity via Möbius congruences and limiting arguments with non-unitary perturbations. The paper also clarifies conditions guaranteeing properness (e.g., global shallow-ness) and connects these results to hyperideal and Koebe-type polyhedra, while proposing conjectures about shallowness and duality.

Abstract

We prove the global rigidity of proper triangulated convex hyperbolic circle polyhedra on the sphere $\mathbb{S}^2$. These circle polyhedra correspond to proper triangulated convex hyperbolic polyhedra in the Beltrami-Klein model $\mathbb{B}^{3}$ of hyperbolic space with hyperideal vertices whose faces meet $\mathbb{B}^{3}$. Although the vertices of these polyhedra lie outside $\mathbb{B}^{3} \cup \mathbb{S}^{2}$ and the faces meet $\mathbb{B}^{3}$, the edges may miss $\mathbb{B}^{3}$ entirely, meet $\mathbb{B}^{3}$, or, more importantly, lie tangent to $\mathbb{B}^{3}$ at ideal points on the boundary $\partial \mathbb{B}^{3} = \mathbb{S}^{2}$. The latter case is new and generalizes the global rigidity results of both Bao-Bonahon and arXiv:1703.09338. This result also generalizes the uniqueness part of the celebrated Koebe-Andre'ev-Thurston theorem to the case where adjacent circles need not touch.

Rigidity of circle polyhedra and hyperideal polyhedra: the tangency case

TL;DR

This work extends global rigidity for proper triangulated convex hyperbolic circle polyhedra on the sphere to include tangency between neighboring vertex-disks, thereby generalizing the Koebe–Andre'ev–Thurston framework. It develops an extended notion of properness, adapts Minkowski/de Sitter geometry to the circle-polyhedron setting, and uses a deformation-and-limit strategy that bypasses the non-unitary obstruction previously required. Central to the approach is the inversive-measure map on the configuration space, which, under strict convexity, has full rank, enabling local-to-global rigidity via Möbius congruences and limiting arguments with non-unitary perturbations. The paper also clarifies conditions guaranteeing properness (e.g., global shallow-ness) and connects these results to hyperideal and Koebe-type polyhedra, while proposing conjectures about shallowness and duality.

Abstract

We prove the global rigidity of proper triangulated convex hyperbolic circle polyhedra on the sphere . These circle polyhedra correspond to proper triangulated convex hyperbolic polyhedra in the Beltrami-Klein model of hyperbolic space with hyperideal vertices whose faces meet . Although the vertices of these polyhedra lie outside and the faces meet , the edges may miss entirely, meet , or, more importantly, lie tangent to at ideal points on the boundary . The latter case is new and generalizes the global rigidity results of both Bao-Bonahon and arXiv:1703.09338. This result also generalizes the uniqueness part of the celebrated Koebe-Andre'ev-Thurston theorem to the case where adjacent circles need not touch.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 8 theorems, 28 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 22 sections, 8 theorems, 28 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Let $P$ and $Q$ be two proper convex hyperbolic non-unitary circle polyhedra. If $P$ and $Q$ are locally congruent, then $P$ and $Q$ are globally congruent.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The construction of $P_t$. (The construction of $Q_t$ is similar.)

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Theorem 2.1: BBP18
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3: bowers2020
  • Definition
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 4.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 5.1
  • Lemma 5.2
  • Lemma 5.3
  • ...and 2 more