Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Optimal Sample Splitting for Observational Studies

Qishuo Yin, Dylan S. Small

Abstract

In observational studies of treatment effects, estimates may be biased by unmeasured confounders, which can potentially affect the validity of the results. Understanding sensitivity to such biases helps assess how unmeasured confounding impacts credibility. The design of an observational study strongly influences its sensitivity to bias. Previous work has shown that the sensitivity to bias can be reduced by dividing a dataset into a planning sample and a larger analysis sample, where the planning sample guides design decisions. But the choice of what fraction of the data to put in the planning sample vs. the analysis sample was ad hoc. Here, we develop an approach to find the optimal fraction using plasmode datasets. We show that our method works well in high-dimensional outcome spaces. We apply our method to study the effects of exposure to second-hand smoke in children. The OptimalSampling R package implementing our method is available at GitHub.

Optimal Sample Splitting for Observational Studies

Abstract

In observational studies of treatment effects, estimates may be biased by unmeasured confounders, which can potentially affect the validity of the results. Understanding sensitivity to such biases helps assess how unmeasured confounding impacts credibility. The design of an observational study strongly influences its sensitivity to bias. Previous work has shown that the sensitivity to bias can be reduced by dividing a dataset into a planning sample and a larger analysis sample, where the planning sample guides design decisions. But the choice of what fraction of the data to put in the planning sample vs. the analysis sample was ad hoc. Here, we develop an approach to find the optimal fraction using plasmode datasets. We show that our method works well in high-dimensional outcome spaces. We apply our method to study the effects of exposure to second-hand smoke in children. The OptimalSampling R package implementing our method is available at GitHub.
Paper Structure (26 sections, 22 equations, 2 figures, 6 tables)

This paper contains 26 sections, 22 equations, 2 figures, 6 tables.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Test power vs. sample split fraction under multiple hypothesis tests for outcomes $K = 10$, sample size $I = 200$, and bias factor $\Gamma = 1$ by selection with $1000$ replications.
  • Figure 2: Box plot for the matched nonbinary covariates - age, poverty, number of rooms in the house, and size of the family - between treated and controlled groups.