Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Correlation-Based Diagnostics of Social Contagion Dynamics in Multiplex Networks

Joan Hernàndez Tey, Emanuele Cozzo

TL;DR

The paper addresses diagnosing multiplex contagion dynamics under partial observability by deriving a mean-field autocorrelation diagnostic for node activity in a two-layer multiplex. It demonstrates that lag-1 autocorrelations capture activation and localization transitions across AL and AD regimes, validated by simulations on RR and ER networks and linked to a spectral criterion via the supra-contact matrix. The study shows that a low-activity observed layer with autocorrelation near 1 - mu indicates a non-dominant layer driven by a hidden dominant layer, enabling inference with limited data, while highlighting limitations near the AL-AD2 crossover where interlayer correlations undermine mean-field accuracy. Overall, temporal autocorrelations emerge as lightweight, structure-agnostic probes for multiplex spreading with practical relevance for data-limited, real-world systems.

Abstract

Multiplex contagion dynamics display localization phenomena in which spreading activity concentrates on a subset of layers, as well as delocalized regimes where layers behave collectively. We investigate how these regimes are encoded in temporal correlations of node activity. By deriving a closed-form mean-field expression for node autocorrelations in a contact-based social contagion multiplex model and validating it through simulations, we show that lag-one autocorrelations act as sensitive indicators of both activation and localization transitions. Our results establish temporal correlations as lightweight, structure-agnostic probes of multiplex spreading dynamics, particularly valuable in partially observable systems.

Correlation-Based Diagnostics of Social Contagion Dynamics in Multiplex Networks

TL;DR

The paper addresses diagnosing multiplex contagion dynamics under partial observability by deriving a mean-field autocorrelation diagnostic for node activity in a two-layer multiplex. It demonstrates that lag-1 autocorrelations capture activation and localization transitions across AL and AD regimes, validated by simulations on RR and ER networks and linked to a spectral criterion via the supra-contact matrix. The study shows that a low-activity observed layer with autocorrelation near 1 - mu indicates a non-dominant layer driven by a hidden dominant layer, enabling inference with limited data, while highlighting limitations near the AL-AD2 crossover where interlayer correlations undermine mean-field accuracy. Overall, temporal autocorrelations emerge as lightweight, structure-agnostic probes for multiplex spreading with practical relevance for data-limited, real-world systems.

Abstract

Multiplex contagion dynamics display localization phenomena in which spreading activity concentrates on a subset of layers, as well as delocalized regimes where layers behave collectively. We investigate how these regimes are encoded in temporal correlations of node activity. By deriving a closed-form mean-field expression for node autocorrelations in a contact-based social contagion multiplex model and validating it through simulations, we show that lag-one autocorrelations act as sensitive indicators of both activation and localization transitions. Our results establish temporal correlations as lightweight, structure-agnostic probes of multiplex spreading dynamics, particularly valuable in partially observable systems.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 27 equations, 11 figures)

This paper contains 15 sections, 27 equations, 11 figures.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Schematic phase diagram in the plane of transmissibility $\beta/\mu$ and interlayer coupling $\eta/\beta$ for a two-layer multiplex with $\Lambda_1>\Lambda_2$. The absorbing phase (I) lies to the left of the criticalpoint $\beta/\mu=1/\bar{\Lambda}_{max}$. In the active phase, strong coupling above $(\eta/\beta)_t\sim \Lambda_1-\Lambda_2$ yields delocalized activity (AD$_2$). For weaker coupling, increasing $\beta/\mu$ above the non-dominant activation threshold $(\beta/\mu)_c^{(2)}$ drives the system from an active--localized regime (AL) to a delocalized endemic regime (AD$_1$). The diagram is schematic and not to scale.
  • Figure 2: Representative correlation functions at steady state for $\beta/\mu=0.1$, $\eta/\beta=0.01$ and $\mu=0.5$. The quantities $\rho_{u,u}^{1,1}$ and $\rho_{u,u}^{2,2}$ are autocorrelations for layers 1 and 2, while $\rho_{u,v}^{1,1}$ and $\rho_{u,v}^{2,2}$ are nearest-neighbor intralayer correlations. The interlayer correlation between replicas of the same node is $\rho_{u,u}^{1,2}$, and $\rho_{u,v}^{1,2}$ denotes interlayer correlations between different nodes. Curves labelled "T." correspond to mean-field predictions obtained from numerical integration of \ref{['eq:mstereq']}.
  • Figure 3: Active--localized regime (AL) for $\eta/\beta=0.01$. Left: correlation measures at lag $h=1$ as functions of $\beta/\mu$. Right: stationary density in each layer as a function of $\beta/\mu$. Vertical dashed lines indicate the single-layer thresholds $1/\Lambda_1$ and $1/\Lambda_2$. Curves labelled "T." correspond to numerical integration of the master equation \ref{['eq:mstereq']}.
  • Figure 4: Active--delocalized regime AD$_2$ ($\eta/\beta=25$). Left: correlation measures at lag $h=1$ vs. $\beta/\mu$. Right: stationary density in each layer. The vertical dashed line at $1/\Lambda_T$ indicates the spectral activation threshold based on the largest eigenvalue of the supra-contact matrix (Eq. \ref{['eq:maxeigen']}). See caption in the original version for the full list of observables.
  • Figure 5: Active--localized regime close to the AL--AD$_2$ crossover ($\eta/\beta=1$). Left: correlation measures at lag $h=1$ vs. $\beta/\mu$. Right: stationary density in each layer. Vertical dashed lines indicate the single-layer thresholds $1/\Lambda_1$ and $1/\Lambda_2$. See caption in the original version for the full list of observables.
  • ...and 6 more figures