Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Emergent spatial organization of competing species under environmental stress and cooperation

Ton Viet Ta

TL;DR

This work develops a unified spatial model that couples population dynamics to four environmental drivers—temperature, pollution, resources, and cooperation—through a dynamic carrying capacity $K_i(x,y,t)$. It combines a reaction–diffusion population equation with linear diffusion–reaction PDEs for $P$, $R$, $T$, and $C$, capturing feedbacks between abiotic forcing and social behavior. Numerically, it reveals emergent persistent spatial patterns and a quasi-stationary dominance structure, with metrics such as boundary length and fractal dimension quantifying pattern simplification over time. To address data sparsity, it introduces a Swin Transformer–based inverse framework that infers high-dimensional parameters from two spatial snapshots, achieving accurate short-term spatial predictions but limited long-term forecasts due to intrinsic nonlinear sensitivity of the system.

Abstract

Understanding how species persist under interacting stressors is a central challenge in ecology. We develop a spatially explicit reaction-diffusion framework to investigate competing species in landscapes shaped by climate variability, pollution, resource heterogeneity, and cooperation. Here, temperature follows low-frequency oscillations, while pollution and resources diffuse from localized sources. Growth is governed by a dynamic carrying capacity integrating abiotic stress with an endogenous, pollution-sensitive cooperation field. Numerical simulations reveal the spontaneous emergence of persistent spatial organization, including dominance segregation and stable competitive boundaries. Quantitative analyses-using boundary geometry, fractal dimension, and spatial entropy-demonstrate a transition from intermixed initial states to low-complexity, quasi-stationary configurations. Coexistence occurs through distinct strategies: one species occupies more area, while the other maintains higher local densities. Cooperation enhances resilience but collapses in polluted zones, creating heterogeneous "social buffering." We further introduce a hybrid inverse modeling framework using a Swin Transformer to infer high-dimensional parameters from only two temporal snapshots. Trained on synthetic data, the model accurately recovers demographic, diffusive, and environmental-sensitivity parameters. While it achieves reliable short-term spatial predictions, long-term forecasts diverge due to the intrinsic sensitivity of nonlinear systems. This unified framework links sparse observations to mechanistic dynamics, advancing biodiversity forecasting under accelerating global change.

Emergent spatial organization of competing species under environmental stress and cooperation

TL;DR

This work develops a unified spatial model that couples population dynamics to four environmental drivers—temperature, pollution, resources, and cooperation—through a dynamic carrying capacity . It combines a reaction–diffusion population equation with linear diffusion–reaction PDEs for , , , and , capturing feedbacks between abiotic forcing and social behavior. Numerically, it reveals emergent persistent spatial patterns and a quasi-stationary dominance structure, with metrics such as boundary length and fractal dimension quantifying pattern simplification over time. To address data sparsity, it introduces a Swin Transformer–based inverse framework that infers high-dimensional parameters from two spatial snapshots, achieving accurate short-term spatial predictions but limited long-term forecasts due to intrinsic nonlinear sensitivity of the system.

Abstract

Understanding how species persist under interacting stressors is a central challenge in ecology. We develop a spatially explicit reaction-diffusion framework to investigate competing species in landscapes shaped by climate variability, pollution, resource heterogeneity, and cooperation. Here, temperature follows low-frequency oscillations, while pollution and resources diffuse from localized sources. Growth is governed by a dynamic carrying capacity integrating abiotic stress with an endogenous, pollution-sensitive cooperation field. Numerical simulations reveal the spontaneous emergence of persistent spatial organization, including dominance segregation and stable competitive boundaries. Quantitative analyses-using boundary geometry, fractal dimension, and spatial entropy-demonstrate a transition from intermixed initial states to low-complexity, quasi-stationary configurations. Coexistence occurs through distinct strategies: one species occupies more area, while the other maintains higher local densities. Cooperation enhances resilience but collapses in polluted zones, creating heterogeneous "social buffering." We further introduce a hybrid inverse modeling framework using a Swin Transformer to infer high-dimensional parameters from only two temporal snapshots. Trained on synthetic data, the model accurately recovers demographic, diffusive, and environmental-sensitivity parameters. While it achieves reliable short-term spatial predictions, long-term forecasts diverge due to the intrinsic sensitivity of nonlinear systems. This unified framework links sparse observations to mechanistic dynamics, advancing biodiversity forecasting under accelerating global change.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 2 theorems, 48 equations, 16 figures)

This paper contains 12 sections, 2 theorems, 48 equations, 16 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The pollution equation pollution, resource equation resource, and cooperation equation cooperation admit unique global classical solutions Moreover, these solutions are nonnegative and uniformly bounded in space and time: there exist constants $M_P,M_R,M_C>0$ such that Consequently, the carrying capacities $K_i(x,y,t)$ defined in capacity satisfy for some constants $K_{\min},K_{\max}$ depending

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: Spatiotemporal evolution of species 1 density
  • Figure 2: Spatiotemporal evolution of species 2 density
  • Figure 3: Temporal evolution of the pollution field
  • Figure 4: Temporal evolution of the resource field
  • Figure 5: Temporal evolution of the cooperation field
  • ...and 11 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • proof