Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The sum-product problem for small sets II

Phillip Antis, Holden Britt, Caleigh Chapman, Elizabeth Hawkins, Alex Rice, Elyse Warren

TL;DR

This work resolves the exact sum-product thresholds for small sets by proving $SP(10)=30$ and $SP(11)=34$, with the extremal configurations unique up to scaling. It combines a log-transform approach to convert products into sums, Freiman-type structure theory, and intensive computational classification to show that near-extremal sets must lie in one of two two-dimensional geometric progression families (up to scaling), or in a single geometric progression. A detailed collision analysis within these GP frameworks yields sharp lower bounds on $|A+A|$, ruling out all but the known extremal examples for $|A|=10$ and $|A|=11$. The paper also provides a comprehensive classification of small-product configurations, introduces algorithmic tools (WinnersSearch) and resultants-based pruning for collision detection, and outlines future work toward higher $k$, including a conjectured $SP(12)=41$ and a higher-dimensional Freiman-type theory.

Abstract

We establish that every set of $k=10$ natural numbers determines at least $30$ distinct pairwise sums or at least $30$ distinct pairwise products, as well as the analogous result for $k=11$ and at least $34$ sums/products, with sharpness uniquely (up to scaling) exhibited by $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18\}$ and $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18, 24\}$, respectively. This extends previous work of the fifth author with Clevenger, Havard, Heard, Lott, and Wilson, which established the corresponding thresholds for $k\leq 9$. Included is a classification result for sets of $10$ real numbers (resp. positive real numbers) determining at most $29$ pairwise sums (resp. pairwise products) that do not contain $8$ elements of any single arithmetic progression (resp. geometric progression), as well as some observations controlling additive quadruples in small subsets of two-dimensional generalized geometric progressions.

The sum-product problem for small sets II

TL;DR

This work resolves the exact sum-product thresholds for small sets by proving and , with the extremal configurations unique up to scaling. It combines a log-transform approach to convert products into sums, Freiman-type structure theory, and intensive computational classification to show that near-extremal sets must lie in one of two two-dimensional geometric progression families (up to scaling), or in a single geometric progression. A detailed collision analysis within these GP frameworks yields sharp lower bounds on , ruling out all but the known extremal examples for and . The paper also provides a comprehensive classification of small-product configurations, introduces algorithmic tools (WinnersSearch) and resultants-based pruning for collision detection, and outlines future work toward higher , including a conjectured and a higher-dimensional Freiman-type theory.

Abstract

We establish that every set of natural numbers determines at least distinct pairwise sums or at least distinct pairwise products, as well as the analogous result for and at least sums/products, with sharpness uniquely (up to scaling) exhibited by and , respectively. This extends previous work of the fifth author with Clevenger, Havard, Heard, Lott, and Wilson, which established the corresponding thresholds for . Included is a classification result for sets of real numbers (resp. positive real numbers) determining at most pairwise sums (resp. pairwise products) that do not contain elements of any single arithmetic progression (resp. geometric progression), as well as some observations controlling additive quadruples in small subsets of two-dimensional generalized geometric progressions.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 17 theorems, 11 equations, 5 figures, 1 table, 3 algorithms)

This paper contains 8 sections, 17 theorems, 11 equations, 5 figures, 1 table, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

SP2023 We have the following exact values for $SP(k)$:

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: One example from items (i)-(iii), and unique structure from (iv), in Lemma \ref{['1029sum']}.
  • Figure 2: Example from item (ii), and unique structure from (iii), in Corollary \ref{['1029sumcor']}.
  • Figure 3: The red and blue boxes indicate the configurations from items (2) and (3), respectively, in Corollary \ref{['sumcornew']}.
  • Figure 4: Single and double two-row collisions.
  • Figure 5: Single and double three-row collisions, showing maximum of $6$ collisions in $G_2$.

Theorems & Definitions (22)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Remark
  • Lemma 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Lemma 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • Remark
  • Corollary 3.3
  • ...and 12 more