Enhancing Language Models for Robust Greenwashing Detection
Neil Heinrich Braun, Keane Ong, Rui Mao, Erik Cambria, Gianmarco Mengaldo
TL;DR
This work tackles robustness gaps in ESG greenwashing detection by structuring latent representations through a parameter-efficient framework that jointly employs contrastive learning and ordinal ranking, augmented with gated feature modulation and MetaGradNorm for stable multi-objective optimization. By applying this approach to LoRA adapters across multiple open-source LLMs on the A3CG dataset, it demonstrates improved cross-category generalization and robustness over strong baselines, while highlighting that model scale alone does not guarantee better transfer. The key contributions include an integrated PEFT pipeline with contrastive+ordinal objectives, a per-sample gating mechanism, and a stabilized optimization strategy, validated through extensive experiments across models and categories. The findings have practical implications for robust ESG claim analysis and point to future work on hyperparameter stability, transferability, and broader multilingual generalization.
Abstract
Sustainability reports are critical for ESG assessment, yet greenwashing and vague claims often undermine their reliability. Existing NLP models lack robustness to these practices, typically relying on surface-level patterns that generalize poorly. We propose a parameter-efficient framework that structures LLM latent spaces by combining contrastive learning with an ordinal ranking objective to capture graded distinctions between concrete actions and ambiguous claims. Our approach incorporates gated feature modulation to filter disclosure noise and utilizes MetaGradNorm to stabilize multi-objective optimization. Experiments in cross-category settings demonstrate superior robustness over standard baselines while revealing a trade-off between representational rigidity and generalization.
