Table of Contents
Fetching ...

New inequalities related to sums of $L^p$ functions in connection with Carbery's problems

Asadollah Aghajani, Juha Kinnunen

TL;DR

This paper advances Minkowski-type inequalities for sums of nonnegative functions in $L^p$ by deriving new two-function bounds valid for all $p\in(1,\infty)$, expressed via the explicit functions $\underline{J}_p$ and $\overline{J}_p$ and depending on cross-terms such as $\|fg^{p-1}\|_1$ and $\|fg^{1/(p-1)}\|_{p-1}$. It then extends these ideas to sums of $n$ nonnegative functions, establishing a sharp $C_p$-dependent inequality for $p\in[2,\infty)$ and, for $p\in[1,2]$, a corresponding reverse inequality, yielding necessary and sufficient conditions for $\sum_j f_j$ to belong to $L^p$ in both regimes. The proofs employ a differential-inequality approach to $F(t)=\int (f+tg)^p$ together with a key lemma bounding $\|fg\|_1$, as well as a fundamental convexity-based inequality for sums of nonnegative terms. The results refine and, in certain cases, improve upon prior bounds in the Carbery–Carlen–Lieb–Mooney framework and resolve regimes of $p$ not previously covered, with clear equality criteria and implications for sequences of $f_j$.

Abstract

Carbery (2006) proposed novel estimates for the $L^p$ norm of a sum of two nonnegative measurable functions. Subsequently, Carlen, Frank, Ivanisvili and Lieb (2018) provided stronger bounds, which Ivanisvili and Mooney (2020) further refined to achieve estimates that are, in a certain sense, optimal. Continuing this line of research, the present work establishes new upper and lower bounds for the range \(p\in(1,\infty)\). Carbery also asked under what conditions on a sequence \((f_j)\) of nonnegative measurable functions the inequality \(\sum \|f_j\|_p^p < \infty\) implies that \(\sum f_j \in L^p\). Ivanisvili and Mooney (2020) resolved this question for \(p\in[1,2]\), and the present work proposes an answer for \(p\in[2,\infty)\).

New inequalities related to sums of $L^p$ functions in connection with Carbery's problems

TL;DR

This paper advances Minkowski-type inequalities for sums of nonnegative functions in by deriving new two-function bounds valid for all , expressed via the explicit functions and and depending on cross-terms such as and . It then extends these ideas to sums of nonnegative functions, establishing a sharp -dependent inequality for and, for , a corresponding reverse inequality, yielding necessary and sufficient conditions for to belong to in both regimes. The proofs employ a differential-inequality approach to together with a key lemma bounding , as well as a fundamental convexity-based inequality for sums of nonnegative terms. The results refine and, in certain cases, improve upon prior bounds in the Carbery–Carlen–Lieb–Mooney framework and resolve regimes of not previously covered, with clear equality criteria and implications for sequences of .

Abstract

Carbery (2006) proposed novel estimates for the norm of a sum of two nonnegative measurable functions. Subsequently, Carlen, Frank, Ivanisvili and Lieb (2018) provided stronger bounds, which Ivanisvili and Mooney (2020) further refined to achieve estimates that are, in a certain sense, optimal. Continuing this line of research, the present work establishes new upper and lower bounds for the range \(p\in(1,\infty)\). Carbery also asked under what conditions on a sequence \((f_j)\) of nonnegative measurable functions the inequality implies that . Ivanisvili and Mooney (2020) resolved this question for , and the present work proposes an answer for \(p\in[2,\infty)\).
Paper Structure (4 sections, 4 theorems, 58 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 4 theorems, 58 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $p\in[2,\infty)$. For any nonnegative functions $f,g\in L^p$, with $\|f\|_p\ne0$ and $\|g\|_p\ne0$, we have Equalities hold if, for some $\alpha,\beta>0$, we have $\alpha f=\beta g$ almost everywhere either on the set $\{g\neq 0\}$ or on $\{f\neq 0\}$, or if $f$ and $g$ have disjoint supports up to a set of measure zero. The reverse inequalities hold for $p\in(1,2]$, with $\max$ and $\min$ in

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.2
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['main']}
  • Remark 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Example 2.5
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 2 more