Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Extremal Love: tidal/electromagnetic deformability, logarithmic running and the weak gravity conjecture

Toshifumi Noumi, Sam S. C. Wong

TL;DR

This work shows that extremal charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell EFT acquire nonzero tidal responses once four-derivative corrections are included, with the vector ($\ell=1$) and parity-odd tensor ($\ell\ge 2$) sectors exhibiting logarithmic running in the Love numbers. The authors derive explicit expressions for electric and magnetic susceptibilities in the $\ell=1$ sector and demonstrate that unitarity and the Weak Gravity Conjecture constrain the signs and RG running of these quantities, linking microscopic UV consistency to macroscopic deformability. They uncover gravito-electromagnetic mixing in the $\ell\ge 2$ sector, producing symmetric cross-log corrections that are naturally captured by a worldline EFT with cross-coupling operators. The results imply that Love numbers are scale-dependent EFT parameters and highlight subtleties in bulk-to-worldline matching, motivating extensions to non-extremal or rotating BHs and potential implications for gravitational-wave phenomenology.

Abstract

In General Relativity, the tidal Love numbers of black holes vanish, implying they are resistant to tidal deformation. This "rigidity" is easily broken in the presence of higher-derivative corrections. Focusing on extremal charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell EFT, we compute the static linear response for both the vector ($\ell=1$) and parity-odd tensor ($\ell \ge 2$) sectors. We find that the resulting tidal Love numbers are non-zero and exhibit logarithmic running, a hallmark of quantum corrections. Crucially, we show that the sign of these deformations is not arbitrary; the induced electric and magnetic susceptibilities and their log runnings in the $\ell=1$ sector are constrained by unitarity and the Weak Gravity Conjecture. Furthermore, due to gravito-electromagnetic mixing, we find the cross log runnings and show that they are the same, which we explain through the worldline effective field theory.

Extremal Love: tidal/electromagnetic deformability, logarithmic running and the weak gravity conjecture

TL;DR

This work shows that extremal charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell EFT acquire nonzero tidal responses once four-derivative corrections are included, with the vector () and parity-odd tensor () sectors exhibiting logarithmic running in the Love numbers. The authors derive explicit expressions for electric and magnetic susceptibilities in the sector and demonstrate that unitarity and the Weak Gravity Conjecture constrain the signs and RG running of these quantities, linking microscopic UV consistency to macroscopic deformability. They uncover gravito-electromagnetic mixing in the sector, producing symmetric cross-log corrections that are naturally captured by a worldline EFT with cross-coupling operators. The results imply that Love numbers are scale-dependent EFT parameters and highlight subtleties in bulk-to-worldline matching, motivating extensions to non-extremal or rotating BHs and potential implications for gravitational-wave phenomenology.

Abstract

In General Relativity, the tidal Love numbers of black holes vanish, implying they are resistant to tidal deformation. This "rigidity" is easily broken in the presence of higher-derivative corrections. Focusing on extremal charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell EFT, we compute the static linear response for both the vector () and parity-odd tensor () sectors. We find that the resulting tidal Love numbers are non-zero and exhibit logarithmic running, a hallmark of quantum corrections. Crucially, we show that the sign of these deformations is not arbitrary; the induced electric and magnetic susceptibilities and their log runnings in the sector are constrained by unitarity and the Weak Gravity Conjecture. Furthermore, due to gravito-electromagnetic mixing, we find the cross log runnings and show that they are the same, which we explain through the worldline effective field theory.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 115 equations, 2 figures)