A Benchmark for Audio Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models
Iwona Christop, Mateusz Czyżnikiewicz, Paweł Skórzewski, Łukasz Bondaruk, Jakub Kubiak, Marcin Lewandowski, Marek Kubis
TL;DR
The paper tackles the problem of evaluating multimodal LLMs on reasoning over complex audio signals by introducing Audio Reasoning Tasks (ART), a template-driven benchmark comprising $9$ tasks that require cross-modal audio understanding and inference. ART combines question, utterance, and sound prompts generated with voice cloning and synthetic speech, enabling end-to-end assessment without leaning on single-task modules. Through two evaluation paradigms (Yes/No and Descriptive) and multiple baselines, the study demonstrates that even strong Audio LLMs struggle on ART, with human baselines around $92.90\%$ and model performances typically well below that level. The work highlights the need for robust, cross-task audio reasoning benchmarks and outlines concrete directions for improving reasoning capabilities in multimodal models, with ART-H providing a practical human-reference subset for quick verification.
Abstract
The present benchmarks for testing the audio modality of multimodal large language models concentrate on testing various audio tasks such as speaker diarization or gender identification in isolation. Whether a multimodal model can answer the questions that require reasoning skills to combine audio tasks of different categories, cannot be verified with their use. To address this issue, we propose Audio Reasoning Tasks (ART), a new benchmark for assessing the ability of multimodal models to solve problems that require reasoning over audio signal.
