Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Variations in the Milky Way's Stellar Mass Function at [Fe/H] < -1

Jiadong Li, Hans-Walter Rix, Yuan-Sen Ting, Yu-Ting Wang, Szabolcs Mészáros, Ilija Medan, Chao Liu, Zhiqiang Yan, Peter J. Smith, Dan Qiu, Alexandre Roman-Lopes, Gregory M. Green, Danny Horta, Zachary Way, Tadafumi Matsuno, Stefano Souza, José G. Fernández-Trincado

TL;DR

This study tests IMF universality by measuring the Milky Way's stellar mass function for metal-poor, low-mass stars ($M_*\,\sim\,0.2$–$0.5\,M_\odot$) with [Fe/H]$<-1$ within ~1 kpc. It combines a probabilistic, halo-leaning kinematic selection with Gaia XP-based metallicities calibrated against SDSS-V to build a high-purity metal-poor sample ($\sim$53,000 stars). A forward-modeling approach accounts for Gaia's selection via a mass- and metallicity-dependent effective volume, yielding a non-parametric MF that varies with metallicity: transitioning from near-flat ($\alpha_1 \approx 0$) at [Fe/H]$\sim -2$ to strongly bottom-heavy ($\alpha_1 \approx -1.8$ to $-2.7$) near [Fe/H]$\sim -1.2$–$-1.5$, with the mass ratio $\xi_{\mathrm MR}$ rising from ~$0.42$ to ~$0.86$. These results indicate that the Milky Way's low-mass MF is not universal and support metallicity-dependent IMF formulations such as IGIMF, with implications for early star formation and galaxy assembly. Future work will refine metallicity calibration at $M_*<0.5\,M_\odot$ and explicitly model binaries to sharpen these constraints.

Abstract

We present the first determination of the Galactic stellar mass function (MF) for low-mass stars (0.2-0.5 M_sun) at metallicities [Fe/H] < -1. A sample of ~53,000 stars was selected as metal-poor on the basis of both their halo-like orbits and their spectroscopic [Fe/H] from Gaia DR3 BP/RP (XP) spectra. These metallicity estimates for low-mass stars were enabled by calibrating Gaia XP spectra with stellar parameters from SDSS-V. For -1.5 < [Fe/H] < -1, we find that the MF below 0.5 M_sun exhibits a "bottom-heavy" power-law slope of alpha ~ -1.6. We tentatively find that at even lower metallicities, the MF becomes very bottom-light, with a near-flat power-law slope of alpha ~ 0 that implies a severe deficit of low-mass stars. This metallicity-dependent variation is insensitive to the adopted stellar evolution model. These results show that the Galactic low-mass MF is not universal, with variations in the metal-poor regime. A further calibration of XP metallicities in the regime of M < 0.5 M_sun and [Fe/H] < -1.5 will be essential to verify these tentative low-metallicity trends.

Variations in the Milky Way's Stellar Mass Function at [Fe/H] < -1

TL;DR

This study tests IMF universality by measuring the Milky Way's stellar mass function for metal-poor, low-mass stars () with [Fe/H] within ~1 kpc. It combines a probabilistic, halo-leaning kinematic selection with Gaia XP-based metallicities calibrated against SDSS-V to build a high-purity metal-poor sample (53,000 stars). A forward-modeling approach accounts for Gaia's selection via a mass- and metallicity-dependent effective volume, yielding a non-parametric MF that varies with metallicity: transitioning from near-flat () at [Fe/H] to strongly bottom-heavy ( to ) near [Fe/H], with the mass ratio rising from ~ to ~. These results indicate that the Milky Way's low-mass MF is not universal and support metallicity-dependent IMF formulations such as IGIMF, with implications for early star formation and galaxy assembly. Future work will refine metallicity calibration at and explicitly model binaries to sharpen these constraints.

Abstract

We present the first determination of the Galactic stellar mass function (MF) for low-mass stars (0.2-0.5 M_sun) at metallicities [Fe/H] < -1. A sample of ~53,000 stars was selected as metal-poor on the basis of both their halo-like orbits and their spectroscopic [Fe/H] from Gaia DR3 BP/RP (XP) spectra. These metallicity estimates for low-mass stars were enabled by calibrating Gaia XP spectra with stellar parameters from SDSS-V. For -1.5 < [Fe/H] < -1, we find that the MF below 0.5 M_sun exhibits a "bottom-heavy" power-law slope of alpha ~ -1.6. We tentatively find that at even lower metallicities, the MF becomes very bottom-light, with a near-flat power-law slope of alpha ~ 0 that implies a severe deficit of low-mass stars. This metallicity-dependent variation is insensitive to the adopted stellar evolution model. These results show that the Galactic low-mass MF is not universal, with variations in the metal-poor regime. A further calibration of XP metallicities in the regime of M < 0.5 M_sun and [Fe/H] < -1.5 will be essential to verify these tentative low-metallicity trends.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 12 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 21 sections, 12 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Color-Magnitude Diagrams (CMDs) of the Gaia XP sample. Left: The CMD of Gaia sources within 1 kpc is color-coded by $\eta$, defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:eta']}, which is the likelihood that a star's orbit is halo-like rather than disk-like. Blue colors denote stars that are more likely to be on halo-like orbits. Right: CMD of the sample with halo-like orbits ($\eta>10$), color-coded by XP-derived metallicity. Typical absolute-magnitude error is dominated by distance uncertainties, with $\sigma_{M_G}\approx 0.08~\mathrm{mag}$ at $d=800~\mathrm{pc}$. The gray background represents sources within 100 pc. The dot--dashed colored lines show loci from the PARSEC stellar evolution models evaluated at a fixed age of 5 Gyr for different metallicities. The black dotted lines indicate iso-mass lines from the PARSEC models.
  • Figure 2: Left: Metallicity distribution of the kinematically pre-selected sample (halo-like orbits, $\eta>10$) and the final metal-poor sample. The orange histogram shows the [Fe/H] distribution for the kinematically selected parent sample within 1 kpc, while the blue histogram shows the distribution for our final metal-poor sample, selected using both kinematic ($\eta$) and chemical ($\text{[Fe/H]} < -1.1$) criteria. The vertical dashed line indicates our metallicity cut. Right: The CMD for our final metal-poor sample with $\eta>10$ and [Fe/H]<-1.1.
  • Figure 3: The estimated effective volume $\tilde{V}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ as a function of absolute magnitude $M_{G0}$. The plot shows how the volume accessible to the survey is much larger for brighter (lower $M_{G0}$), more massive stars than for fainter, less massive ones.
  • Figure 4: Stellar mass functions for the metal-poor sample. The logarithmic mass density, $\log_{10}\Phi$ [number kpc$^{-3}$ M$_\odot^{-1}$], is shown as a function of stellar mass $M$ for different metallicity bins (color-coded by [Fe/H], see color bar). Stellar masses are derived from PARSEC models (solid lines) and BaSTI models (dotted lines). Symbols show the binned densities with shaded bands indicating $1\sigma$ uncertainties. The dashed gray line shows the canonical Kroupa IMF, scaled for visual comparison.