Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Existence of Weak Solutions to a Constrained Aggregation-Diffusion-Reaction Model for Multiple Sclerosis

S. Fagioli, M. Kamath Katapady

TL;DR

This work proves the existence of weak solutions for a constrained nonlocal PDE modeling multiple sclerosis, coupling macrophage density $\rho$ with a constraint density $\beta$ via nonlocal chemotaxis governed by a kernel $K$ and saturation $h$. The authors employ a variational approach: first, a transport step implemented through a JKO-type minimizing movement scheme for the energy $\mathscr{F}[\rho|\nu]=\mathscr{A}[\rho]+\mathscr{K}[\rho]+\mathscr{S}[\rho|\nu]$ to handle aggregation-diffusion under the constraint, and then a splitting step to incorporate the reaction term $M(\rho)$, yielding a full transport-reaction scheme. A flow-interchange argument using the entropy $\mathscr{H}$ provides necessary compactness, yielding strong convergence for $\rho^{\gamma/2}$ and enabling passage to the limit in the nonlinear and nonlocal terms; the constraint yields $h(\rho)(1-\beta)=0$ and $\beta$ converges to a limit describing oligodendrocyte dynamics. The main result ensures the existence of a pair $(\rho,\beta)$ on $[0,T]$ with $\rho_0\in L^1\cap L^\gamma$, $\gamma>\max\{1,(d-2)/2\}$, that satisfies the weak formulation of the full constrained system.

Abstract

We establish an existence result for weak solutions to an aggregation-diffusion-reaction equation with a constraint, arising in the modelling of multiple sclerosis. The model is derived from a general chemotaxis-type framework and describes the time evolution of the density of activated macrophages, which is subject to attraction by oligodendrocytes. The latter are governed by a constraint equation. The proof relies on a variational splitting scheme that isolates the transport (aggregation-diffusion) and reaction contributions. The structure of the constraint makes it possible to recover the oligodendrocyte density as the limit of a sequence of characteristic functions.

Existence of Weak Solutions to a Constrained Aggregation-Diffusion-Reaction Model for Multiple Sclerosis

TL;DR

This work proves the existence of weak solutions for a constrained nonlocal PDE modeling multiple sclerosis, coupling macrophage density with a constraint density via nonlocal chemotaxis governed by a kernel and saturation . The authors employ a variational approach: first, a transport step implemented through a JKO-type minimizing movement scheme for the energy to handle aggregation-diffusion under the constraint, and then a splitting step to incorporate the reaction term , yielding a full transport-reaction scheme. A flow-interchange argument using the entropy provides necessary compactness, yielding strong convergence for and enabling passage to the limit in the nonlinear and nonlocal terms; the constraint yields and converges to a limit describing oligodendrocyte dynamics. The main result ensures the existence of a pair on with , , that satisfies the weak formulation of the full constrained system.

Abstract

We establish an existence result for weak solutions to an aggregation-diffusion-reaction equation with a constraint, arising in the modelling of multiple sclerosis. The model is derived from a general chemotaxis-type framework and describes the time evolution of the density of activated macrophages, which is subject to attraction by oligodendrocytes. The latter are governed by a constraint equation. The proof relies on a variational splitting scheme that isolates the transport (aggregation-diffusion) and reaction contributions. The structure of the constraint makes it possible to recover the oligodendrocyte density as the limit of a sequence of characteristic functions.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 17 theorems, 132 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 17 theorems, 132 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Let $\mu,\nu\in L^1_+({\mathbb{R}^{d}}).$ The following are true:

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Definition 2.1: Bounded-Lipschitz distance
  • Proposition 2.1: Properties of $d_\mathrm{BL}$
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Definition 3.1
  • Remark 3.1
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 22 more