Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the SOS Rank of Simple and Diagonal Biquadratic Forms

Yi Xu, Chufeng Cui, Liqun Qi

TL;DR

The paper investigates the SOS rank of structured biquadratic forms, focusing on simple and diagonal classes. It establishes that the maximum SOS rank for $3\times3$ simple biquadratic forms is $6$, and provides a linear lower bound $2m$ for $m\times m$ simple forms; for $3\times3$ diagonal forms with nonnegative coefficients, the SOS rank is bounded by $7$, improving the general bound. The authors develop a sparse-form framework with combinatorial arguments, including a rectangle extraction lemma, to derive upper bounds from support and construct high-rank sparse examples, showing the SOS rank can grow with the number of terms. They also connect these results to Gram-matrix sparsity, discuss open problems (notably $\mathrm{BSR}(3,3)$), and extend the methods to broader sparse classes, highlighting how structure reduces the number of squares needed in SOS representations.

Abstract

We study the sum-of-squares (SOS) rank of simple and diagonal biquadratic forms. For simple biquadratic forms in $3 \times 3$ variables, we show that the maximum SOS rank is exactly $6$, attained by a specific six-term form. We further prove that for any $m \ge 3$, there exists an $m \times m$ simple biquadratic form whose SOS rank is exactly $2m$, providing a general lower bound that extends the $3\times3$ case. For diagonal biquadratic forms with nonnegative coefficients, we prove an SOS rank upper bound of $7$, improving the general bound of $8$ for $3 \times 3$ forms. In addition, we extend the techniques to a broader class of \textbf{sparse biquadratic forms}, obtaining combinatorial upper bounds and constructing explicit families whose SOS rank grows linearly with the number of terms. These results provide new lower and upper bounds on the worst-case SOS rank of biquadratic forms and highlight the role of structure in reducing the required number of squares.

On the SOS Rank of Simple and Diagonal Biquadratic Forms

TL;DR

The paper investigates the SOS rank of structured biquadratic forms, focusing on simple and diagonal classes. It establishes that the maximum SOS rank for simple biquadratic forms is , and provides a linear lower bound for simple forms; for diagonal forms with nonnegative coefficients, the SOS rank is bounded by , improving the general bound. The authors develop a sparse-form framework with combinatorial arguments, including a rectangle extraction lemma, to derive upper bounds from support and construct high-rank sparse examples, showing the SOS rank can grow with the number of terms. They also connect these results to Gram-matrix sparsity, discuss open problems (notably ), and extend the methods to broader sparse classes, highlighting how structure reduces the number of squares needed in SOS representations.

Abstract

We study the sum-of-squares (SOS) rank of simple and diagonal biquadratic forms. For simple biquadratic forms in variables, we show that the maximum SOS rank is exactly , attained by a specific six-term form. We further prove that for any , there exists an simple biquadratic form whose SOS rank is exactly , providing a general lower bound that extends the case. For diagonal biquadratic forms with nonnegative coefficients, we prove an SOS rank upper bound of , improving the general bound of for forms. In addition, we extend the techniques to a broader class of \textbf{sparse biquadratic forms}, obtaining combinatorial upper bounds and constructing explicit families whose SOS rank grows linearly with the number of terms. These results provide new lower and upper bounds on the worst-case SOS rank of biquadratic forms and highlight the role of structure in reducing the required number of squares.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 12 theorems, 47 equations)

This paper contains 13 sections, 12 theorems, 47 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

The form satisfies $\operatorname{sos}(P') = 6$.

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Theorem 2.1: A $3 \times 3$ simple form requiring six squares
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 16 more