Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Uniformly balanced $H$-factors in multicoloured complete graphs

Agnijo Banerjee, Lawrence Hollom

TL;DR

The paper resolves Hollom's question by proving that for fixed integers $k,r\ge 2$ there exists a constant $C_{k,r}$ such that every graph $H$ on $r$ vertices and every balanced $k$-colouring of $K_{nrk}$ contains an $H$-factor $F$ whose colour distribution deviates from perfect balance by at most $C_{k,r}$. It generalises to colourings with colours as unit vectors in $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$, yielding a bound on $\|\sum_{e\in E(F)} c(e)\|$; in the simplex case an explicit bound $C=(8dr)^{(8dr)^{d+1}-1}$ is given. The proof proceeds in two stages: first construct a colour-balanced $K_r$-factor via a contradictory-swaps argument and a geometric hyperplane partition, then embed an $H$-factor inside the $K_r$-factor to inherit the balance up to a fixed additive error. The results unify discrete and continuous colour models and suggest directions for tightening constants and extending to broader graph families.

Abstract

A balanced colouring of a graph is one in which every colour appears the same number of times. Given a fixed graph $H$ on $r$ vertices and a balanced $k$-colouring of the complete graph $K_{nrk}$, Hollom (2025) asked the following question: can we always find an $H$-factor $F$ covering all vertices of the complete graph $K_{nrk}$ such that the inherited colouring of $F$ is almost balanced? This is known to be the case for palettes of only two colours, or when $H$ is only a single edge. We answer the above question in full, finding an $H$-factor which is at most $C_{r,k}$ edges away from being balanced, where $C_{r,k}$ depends only on $r$ and $k$. In fact, we work in the more general setting wherein our palette of colours is a subset of $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$, and find an $H$-factor where the sum of the colours of all edges has bounded Euclidean norm.

Uniformly balanced $H$-factors in multicoloured complete graphs

TL;DR

The paper resolves Hollom's question by proving that for fixed integers there exists a constant such that every graph on vertices and every balanced -colouring of contains an -factor whose colour distribution deviates from perfect balance by at most . It generalises to colourings with colours as unit vectors in , yielding a bound on ; in the simplex case an explicit bound is given. The proof proceeds in two stages: first construct a colour-balanced -factor via a contradictory-swaps argument and a geometric hyperplane partition, then embed an -factor inside the -factor to inherit the balance up to a fixed additive error. The results unify discrete and continuous colour models and suggest directions for tightening constants and extending to broader graph families.

Abstract

A balanced colouring of a graph is one in which every colour appears the same number of times. Given a fixed graph on vertices and a balanced -colouring of the complete graph , Hollom (2025) asked the following question: can we always find an -factor covering all vertices of the complete graph such that the inherited colouring of is almost balanced? This is known to be the case for palettes of only two colours, or when is only a single edge. We answer the above question in full, finding an -factor which is at most edges away from being balanced, where depends only on and . In fact, we work in the more general setting wherein our palette of colours is a subset of , and find an -factor where the sum of the colours of all edges has bounded Euclidean norm.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 11 theorems, 84 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 11 theorems, 84 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For all integers $k,r\geq 2$ there is a constant $C=C_{k,r}$ such that the following holds. For every graph $H$ on $r$ vertices, integer $n$ and balanced $k$-colouring $c\colon E(K_{nrk}) \to [k]$, there is an $H$-factor $F$ of $K_{nrk}$ such that where $C$ depends only on $k$ and $r$. In particular, we may take

Theorems & Definitions (24)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Conjecture 1.3
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Definition 3.2
  • Definition 3.3
  • Lemma 3.4
  • proof
  • Definition 3.5
  • Definition 3.6
  • ...and 14 more