Balancing Privacy and Robustness in Coded Computing Under Profiled Workers
Rimpi Borah, J. Harshan, Aaditya Sharma
TL;DR
This work extends Numerically Stable Lagrange Coded Computing (NS-LCC) to environments with profiled, untrusted workers, explicitly modeling both curious and Byzantine attackers under finite-precision arithmetic.The core methods include a Chebyshev-node based encoding, a DCT-based robustness reconstruction, and a mutual-information security (MIS) framework to quantify privacy leakage from colluding workers.Key contributions are (i) finite-precision MIS and localization-error bounds that depend on evaluation-index placement, (ii) strategies to assign evaluation indices to unreliable workers to separately optimize privacy and robustness, and (iii) a low-complexity greedy algorithm that jointly balances the two objectives.The results illuminate a fundamental trade-off: index placements that maximize privacy tend to worsen error localization, while robust localization demands reduce privacy, and the proposed joint approach provides practical near-optimal balancing for distributed coded computing with profiled workers.
Abstract
In distributed computing with untrusted workers, the assignment of evaluation indices plays a critical role in determining both privacy and robustness. In this work, we study how the placement of unreliable workers within the Numerically Stable Lagrange Coded Computing (NS-LCC) framework influences privacy and the ability to localize Byzantine errors. We derive analytical bounds that quantify how different evaluation-index assignments affect privacy against colluding curious workers and robustness against Byzantine corruption under finite-precision arithmetic. Using these bounds, we formulate optimization problems that identify privacy-optimal and robustness-optimal index placements and show that the resulting assignments are fundamentally different. This exposes that index choices that maximizes privacy degrade error-localization, and vice versa. To jointly navigate this trade-off, we propose a low-complexity greedy assignment strategy that closely approximates the optimal balance between privacy and robustness.
