Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Finite-Time Transition to Intermittency for a Stochastic Heat Equation Driven by the Square of a Gaussian Field

Philippe Mounaix

TL;DR

This work analyzes the finite-time spatial behavior of the stochastic heat equation driven by the square of a Gaussian field, focusing on the finite-time field $\mathcal{E}(x,g)=\psi(x,T)$. It establishes a critical coupling $g_c(T)$ defined by the divergence of $\langle \mathcal{E}(0,g)\rangle_S$ and shows a sharp phase transition: for $g<g_c(T)$ the field is spatially ergodic and non-intermittent, while for $g>g_c(T)$ it becomes spatially intermittent with a breakdown of ergodicity. The critical coupling is characterized via the maximal first eigenvalue $\mu_{\max}$ of the Gaussian field’s covariance operator, $g_c=\frac{1}{2\mu_{\max}}$, derived through a Feynman–Kac representation and spectral analysis. Unlike the well-studied case with linear noise in $S$, which exhibits asymptotic intermittency as $T\to\infty$, this work reveals a finite-time onset of intermittency and discusses open questions about the behavior at $g=g_c$ and extensions to higher dimensions and the diffractive setting.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the spatial behavior of the solution $ψ(x,t)$ to the stochastic heat equation $\partial_tψ(x,t)-\frac{1}{2}\partial^2_{x^2} ψ(x,t)=g\, S(x,t)^2\, ψ(x,t)$, with $0\le t\le T$, $x\in\mathbb{R}$, and $ψ(x,0)=1$. Here, $g>0$ is a coupling constant and $S(x,t)$ is a stationary, homogeneous, and ergodic Gaussian field. Focusing on $\mathcal{E}(x,g)\equiv ψ(x,T)$ at a finite time $T>0$, we identify the critical coupling $g_c(T)$ above which the average of $\mathcal{E}(0,g)$ diverges. We show that in the subcritical regime $g<g_c(T)$, $\mathcal{E}(x,g)$ is spatially ergodic, with no intermittency, while in the supercritical regime $g>g_c(T)$ it becomes spatially intermittent and loses ergodicity. Our results differ from the extensively studied case where $S(x,t)^2$ is replaced by $S(x,t)$, in which intermittency appears only asymptotically as $T\to +\infty$, with no finite-time intermittency.

Finite-Time Transition to Intermittency for a Stochastic Heat Equation Driven by the Square of a Gaussian Field

TL;DR

This work analyzes the finite-time spatial behavior of the stochastic heat equation driven by the square of a Gaussian field, focusing on the finite-time field . It establishes a critical coupling defined by the divergence of and shows a sharp phase transition: for the field is spatially ergodic and non-intermittent, while for it becomes spatially intermittent with a breakdown of ergodicity. The critical coupling is characterized via the maximal first eigenvalue of the Gaussian field’s covariance operator, , derived through a Feynman–Kac representation and spectral analysis. Unlike the well-studied case with linear noise in , which exhibits asymptotic intermittency as , this work reveals a finite-time onset of intermittency and discusses open questions about the behavior at and extensions to higher dimensions and the diffractive setting.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the spatial behavior of the solution to the stochastic heat equation , with , , and . Here, is a coupling constant and is a stationary, homogeneous, and ergodic Gaussian field. Focusing on at a finite time , we identify the critical coupling above which the average of diverges. We show that in the subcritical regime , is spatially ergodic, with no intermittency, while in the supercritical regime it becomes spatially intermittent and loses ergodicity. Our results differ from the extensively studied case where is replaced by , in which intermittency appears only asymptotically as , with no finite-time intermittency.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 5 theorems, 74 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 5 theorems, 74 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1

The mapping $x(\cdot)\mapsto\mu_1[x(\cdot)]$ is continuous on $B(0,T)$ endowed with the uniform norm $\| x(\cdot)\|_\infty =\sup_{0\le t\le T}\vert x(t)\vert$.

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Lemma 1
  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Lemma 2