Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Robust additive bases without minimal subbases

Daniel Larsen, Michael Larsen

TL;DR

The work resolves a question of Erdős and Nathanson by constructing an additive basis of order two whose representations grow at least like a constant times $\log m$ for large $m$, yet which contains no minimal subbasis. The authors implement a block-wise, probabilistic construction across exponentially growing intervals, thinning and then thickening each block to control $r_A(m)$ while preserving fragile, non-minimal structure in potential subbases. Central to the argument are concentration bounds (Chernoff) and almost-sure (Borel–Cantelli) controls, plus a dihedral-group counting framework to bound higher-order representations and ensure independence of blocks. The resulting set $A$ demonstrates that even logarithmic representation growth does not guarantee the existence of a minimal subbasis, advancing the understanding of additive-basis structure and minimality phenomena.

Abstract

There exists a set $A$ of positive integers such that the number of representations of a large positive integer $m$ as a sum of two elements of $A$ grows with a lower bound of order $\log m$, but for which there is no subset $D$ of $A$ minimal for the property that $D+D$ contains all sufficiently large positive integers.

Robust additive bases without minimal subbases

TL;DR

The work resolves a question of Erdős and Nathanson by constructing an additive basis of order two whose representations grow at least like a constant times for large , yet which contains no minimal subbasis. The authors implement a block-wise, probabilistic construction across exponentially growing intervals, thinning and then thickening each block to control while preserving fragile, non-minimal structure in potential subbases. Central to the argument are concentration bounds (Chernoff) and almost-sure (Borel–Cantelli) controls, plus a dihedral-group counting framework to bound higher-order representations and ensure independence of blocks. The resulting set demonstrates that even logarithmic representation growth does not guarantee the existence of a minimal subbasis, advancing the understanding of additive-basis structure and minimality phenomena.

Abstract

There exists a set of positive integers such that the number of representations of a large positive integer as a sum of two elements of grows with a lower bound of order , but for which there is no subset of minimal for the property that contains all sufficiently large positive integers.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 10 theorems, 44 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 10 theorems, 44 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

There exists $\varepsilon>0$ and a set $A\subset \mathbb N$ such that:

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Theorem 1
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Corollary 3
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Proposition 5
  • proof
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • ...and 8 more