Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quasiregular maps of Sierpiński carpet Julia sets

Sergei Merenkov, Letian Shen

TL;DR

The paper proves a strong rigidity phenomenon for quasiregular maps between carpet Julia sets of postcritically finite rational maps, showing that any $\xi$ with $\xi^{-1}(\mathcal{J}(g))=\mathcal{J}(f)$ extends to a rational map on $\widehat{\mathbb{C}}$, and, in the case $f=g$, satisfies a dynamical relation $f^k\circ \xi^l=f^{2k}$. The approach blends Schottky-map local rigidity, conformal elevator techniques, and entropy-based arguments to produce a global functional equation on $\mathcal{J}(f)$, extend it to a rational map, and deduce postcritical finiteness and iterates relations. The work extends prior results by Bonk–Lyubich–Merenkov and clarifies the role of carpet topology; it also shows that these rigidity phenomena can fail for Julia sets of other topologies such as tree-like or gasket types. Overall, the paper advances understanding of how quasiregular maps are constrained by carpet Julia-set dynamics and highlights sharp contrasts with non-carpet cases.

Abstract

We prove that if $f$ and $g$ are postcritically finite rational maps whose Julia sets $\mathcal{J}(f), \mathcal{J}(g)$, respectively, are Sierpiński carpets, and if $ξ$ is a quasiregular map of the Riemann sphere $\widehat{\mathbb{C}}$ with $ξ^{-1}(\mathcal{J}(g))=\mathcal{J}(f)$, then $ξ$ is the restriction of a rational map to the Julia set $\mathcal{J}(f)$. Moreover, when $g=f$ we prove that, for some positive integers $k$ and $l$, $f^k\circ ξ^l=f^{2k}$. These conclusions extend the main results of M. Bonk, M. Lyubich, S. Merenkov, Quasisymmetries of Sierpiński carpet Julia sets, Adv. Math, 301 (2016), 383-422. Finally, we demonstrate that when Julia sets of postcritically finite rational maps are not Sierpiński carpets, say they are tree-like or gaskets, the above conclusions no longer hold.

Quasiregular maps of Sierpiński carpet Julia sets

TL;DR

The paper proves a strong rigidity phenomenon for quasiregular maps between carpet Julia sets of postcritically finite rational maps, showing that any with extends to a rational map on , and, in the case , satisfies a dynamical relation . The approach blends Schottky-map local rigidity, conformal elevator techniques, and entropy-based arguments to produce a global functional equation on , extend it to a rational map, and deduce postcritical finiteness and iterates relations. The work extends prior results by Bonk–Lyubich–Merenkov and clarifies the role of carpet topology; it also shows that these rigidity phenomena can fail for Julia sets of other topologies such as tree-like or gasket types. Overall, the paper advances understanding of how quasiregular maps are constrained by carpet Julia-set dynamics and highlights sharp contrasts with non-carpet cases.

Abstract

We prove that if and are postcritically finite rational maps whose Julia sets , respectively, are Sierpiński carpets, and if is a quasiregular map of the Riemann sphere with , then is the restriction of a rational map to the Julia set . Moreover, when we prove that, for some positive integers and , . These conclusions extend the main results of M. Bonk, M. Lyubich, S. Merenkov, Quasisymmetries of Sierpiński carpet Julia sets, Adv. Math, 301 (2016), 383-422. Finally, we demonstrate that when Julia sets of postcritically finite rational maps are not Sierpiński carpets, say they are tree-like or gaskets, the above conclusions no longer hold.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 14 theorems, 27 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 14 theorems, 27 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $f$ and $g$ be two postcritically finite rational maps and suppose that the corresponding Julia sets $\mathcal{J}(f)$ and $\mathcal{J}(g)$ are Sierpiński carpets. If $\xi$ is a quasisymmetric homeomorphism of $\mathcal{J}(f)$ onto $\mathcal{J}(g)$, then it is the restriction to $\mathcal{J}(f)$

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Theorem 1.1: BLM
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 2.1: Stoïlow's Factorization
  • Theorem 2.2: AIM
  • Lemma 3.1: Me3
  • Theorem 3.2: Me2
  • Theorem 3.3: Me2
  • Lemma 4.1: BLM
  • Proposition 5.1
  • ...and 4 more