Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Dynamical study of $πN\to ππN$ reactions revisited

H. Kamano, T. -S. H. Lee

TL;DR

This work uses the ANL-Osaka dynamical coupled-channel framework, fitted to two-body meson-nucleon data, to predict the cross sections and distributions for $πN\to ππN$ across a wide energy range. By decomposing the reaction into quasi-two-body channels $πΔ$, $ρN$, and $σN$ plus a direct term, the study identifies how $N^*$ couplings to these channels shape the observables and demonstrates where current single-meson data leave ambiguities in the high-mass resonance sector. Comparisons with existing data reveal overall qualitative agreement but systematic overestimation above $W\sim1.65$ GeV, pointing to needed refinements of $N^*\toπΔ$, $N^*\to ρN$, and $N^*\to σN$ couplings, especially in the Roper region and higher-mass states in the $S_{31}$, $P_{33}$, $D_{33}$, and $F_{37}$ partial waves. The paper provides a detailed sensitivity analysis that maps which observables and energy ranges are most effective for constraining $N^*$ parameters, offering practical guidance for upcoming J-PARC measurements of $πN\toππN$ and for improving the extraction of high-mass nucleon resonances.

Abstract

Using the Argonne National Laboratory-The University of Osaka (ANL-Osaka) DCC model of meson-nucleon reactions, we extend the study of Phys. Rev. C 79, 025206 (2009) and Phys. Rev. C 88, 045203 (2013) to predict the cross sections of the $πN \to ππN$ reactions. The model was constructed by fitting only the two-body reactions: $πN,γN \to πN, ηN, KΛ, KΣ$. Thus, the results for $πN \to ππN$ presented here are predictions of the ANL-Osaka DCC model, which serve to examine the extent to which the forthcoming data from J-PARC can be described. This study provides information for improving the extraction of nucleon resonances that have large decay widths to $ππN$ states. We present results for the total cross sections, invariant mass distributions, and angular distributions. We also identify the observables and energy regions where the higher mass nucleon resonances in the $S_{31}$, $P_{33}$, $D_{33}$, $F_{37}$, $D_{13}$, $D_{15}$, and $F_{15}$ partial waves can be most effectively investigated.

Dynamical study of $πN\to ππN$ reactions revisited

TL;DR

This work uses the ANL-Osaka dynamical coupled-channel framework, fitted to two-body meson-nucleon data, to predict the cross sections and distributions for across a wide energy range. By decomposing the reaction into quasi-two-body channels , , and plus a direct term, the study identifies how couplings to these channels shape the observables and demonstrates where current single-meson data leave ambiguities in the high-mass resonance sector. Comparisons with existing data reveal overall qualitative agreement but systematic overestimation above GeV, pointing to needed refinements of , , and couplings, especially in the Roper region and higher-mass states in the , , , and partial waves. The paper provides a detailed sensitivity analysis that maps which observables and energy ranges are most effective for constraining parameters, offering practical guidance for upcoming J-PARC measurements of and for improving the extraction of high-mass nucleon resonances.

Abstract

Using the Argonne National Laboratory-The University of Osaka (ANL-Osaka) DCC model of meson-nucleon reactions, we extend the study of Phys. Rev. C 79, 025206 (2009) and Phys. Rev. C 88, 045203 (2013) to predict the cross sections of the reactions. The model was constructed by fitting only the two-body reactions: . Thus, the results for presented here are predictions of the ANL-Osaka DCC model, which serve to examine the extent to which the forthcoming data from J-PARC can be described. This study provides information for improving the extraction of nucleon resonances that have large decay widths to states. We present results for the total cross sections, invariant mass distributions, and angular distributions. We also identify the observables and energy regions where the higher mass nucleon resonances in the , , , , , , and partial waves can be most effectively investigated.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 10 equations, 28 figures)

This paper contains 12 sections, 10 equations, 28 figures.

Figures (28)

  • Figure 1: Schematic representation of the $\pi N \to \pi\pi N$ reaction mechanisms. The figure is from Ref. ao13-2.
  • Figure 2: Total cross sections of (a) $\pi^+ p \to \pi^+\pi^+ n$, (b) $\pi^+p \to \pi^+\pi^0p$, (c) $\pi^- p \to \pi^+\pi^- n$, (d) $\pi^-p \to \pi^0\pi^0 n$, and (e) $\pi^- p \to \pi^-\pi^0 p$. Solid (red) curves are the full results; dashed (blue) curves are the results of $T^{\pi\Delta}$ process only; dash-dot (green) curves are the results of $T^{\rho N}$ process only; dash-dash-dot (indigo) curves are the results of $T^{\sigma N}$ process only; and dotted (black) curves are the results of $T^\textrm{dir}$ process only. See Refs. manleyao09-1 and references therein for the data.
  • Figure 3: Contribution of each partial wave to the $\pi^+ p \to \pi \pi N$ total cross sections: (a) $\pi^+ p \to \pi^+ \pi^+ n$ and (b) $\pi^+ p \to \pi^+ \pi^0 p$. Solid curves are the full results, while dashed curves are contributions of each partial wave to the cross sections. See Refs. manleyao09-1 and references therein for the data.
  • Figure 4: Contribution of each partial wave to the $\pi^- p \to \pi \pi N$ total cross sections. Panels (a) and (b) $\pi^- p \to \pi^+ \pi^- n$, (c) and (d) $\pi^- p \to \pi^0 \pi^0 n$, and (e) and (f) $\pi^- p \to \pi^-\pi^0 p$. Panels (a), (c), and (e) [(b), (d), and (f)] present $I=1/2$ [$I=/3/2$] partial waves. Solid curves are the full results, while dashed curves are contributions of each partial wave to the cross sections. See Refs. manleyao09-1 and references therein for the data.
  • Figure 5: Comparison with the HADES data hades for the invariant mass distributions at $W=1487$ MeV ($p_{\textrm{in}}=685$ MeV/c with $p_{\textrm{in}}$ being pion beam momenta). Panels (a) and (b) are of $\pi^- p \to \pi^+\pi^- n$, and panels (c) and (d) are of $\pi^- p \to \pi^-\pi^0 p$. The meaning of each curve is the same as in Fig. \ref{['fig:tcrs']}
  • ...and 23 more figures