Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Generalization on the higher moments of the Fourier coefficients of symmetric power $L$-functions

K. Venkatasubbareddy

TL;DR

This work studies the higher-moment averages of the Fourier coefficients of symmetric power $L$-functions attached to a primitive holomorphic cusp form. It develops a framework based on the Dirichlet series $L_{l,j}(s)$, obtained from the $l$th power of $\lambda_{\mathrm{sym}^j f}(n)$, and decomposes it into a product of zeta powers and symmetric-power $L$-functions of degree $D=(j+1)^l$. The authors prove a general asymptotic: for $lj$ even, $\\sum_{n\\le x} \\lambda_{ {\\rm{sym}}^j}^l(n)= x P_{d_{lj/2}-1}(\\log x) + O(x^{\\theta_{l,j}+\\varepsilon})$, and for $lj$ odd, a pure power-saving bound $O(x^{\\theta_{l,j}+\\varepsilon})$, with explicitly given $\\theta_{l,j}$ depending on $D$, $d_m$, and $e_m$, thus improving previous exponents. A special treatment is provided for $l=j=2$. The results advance understanding of higher-moment behavior of symmetric power Fourier coefficients and have potential implications for refined bounds in the analytic theory of $L$-functions. Methods include Perron’s formula, contour integration, and mean-value bounds for families of $L$-functions, combined to yield sharp main terms and quantified error terms.

Abstract

For an even integer $k\geq 2$, let $f$ be a primitive holomorphic cusp form of weight $k$ for the full modular group $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ and let $λ_{\rm{sym}^jf}(n)$ denote the $n^\text{th}$ normalized Fourier coefficient of the $j^{\text{th}}$ symmetric power $L$-function $L(s,{\rm{sym}}^j f)$. It has been an interesting problem to study the average behaviour of $λ_{\rm{sym}^jf}(n)$ and their higher powers, and many researchers in the literature have studied the sum \begin{equation*} \sum_{n\leq x} λ_{\rm{sym}^j}^l(n), \end{equation*} for various values of $l$ and $j$. In this paper, we improve and generalize previously known results concerning the sum above for positive integers $l$ and $j$ such that $lj\geq 4$.

Generalization on the higher moments of the Fourier coefficients of symmetric power $L$-functions

TL;DR

This work studies the higher-moment averages of the Fourier coefficients of symmetric power -functions attached to a primitive holomorphic cusp form. It develops a framework based on the Dirichlet series , obtained from the th power of , and decomposes it into a product of zeta powers and symmetric-power -functions of degree . The authors prove a general asymptotic: for even, , and for odd, a pure power-saving bound , with explicitly given depending on , , and , thus improving previous exponents. A special treatment is provided for . The results advance understanding of higher-moment behavior of symmetric power Fourier coefficients and have potential implications for refined bounds in the analytic theory of -functions. Methods include Perron’s formula, contour integration, and mean-value bounds for families of -functions, combined to yield sharp main terms and quantified error terms.

Abstract

For an even integer , let be a primitive holomorphic cusp form of weight for the full modular group and let denote the normalized Fourier coefficient of the symmetric power -function . It has been an interesting problem to study the average behaviour of and their higher powers, and many researchers in the literature have studied the sum \begin{equation*} \sum_{n\leq x} λ_{\rm{sym}^j}^l(n), \end{equation*} for various values of and . In this paper, we improve and generalize previously known results concerning the sum above for positive integers and such that .
Paper Structure (3 sections, 8 theorems, 55 equations, 2 tables)

This paper contains 3 sections, 8 theorems, 55 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1

For any $\varepsilon>0$, we have where $P_k(y)$ is a polynomial of degree $k$ in $y$, when $k=0$, $P_k(y)$ denotes some constant, and $D=(j+1)^l$ is the degree of the $L$-function $L_{l,j}(s)$ defined in Lemma L2.3, $d_i$'s and $e_i$'s are as in Lemma L2.2.

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Theorem 1
  • Remark 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 6 more