Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order

Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Christoph Nega, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, Johann Usovitsch

Abstract

Using the worldline quantum field theory formalism, we compute the conservative scattering angle and impulse for classical black hole scattering at fifth post-Minkowskian (5PM) order by providing the second self-force (2SF) contributions. This four-loop calculation involves non-planar Feynman integrals and requires advanced integration-by-parts reduction, novel differential-equation strategies, and efficient boundary-integral algorithms to solve a system of hundreds of master integrals in four integral families on high-performance computing systems. The resulting function space includes multiple polylogarithms as well as iterated integrals with a K3 period, which generate a spurious velocity divergence at $v/c=\sqrt{8}/3$. This divergence is present in the potential region and must be canceled by contributions from the radiative memory region, while its dimensional-regularisation pole should cancel against the radiative tail region. We find that the standard use of Feynman propagators to access the conservative sector fails to ensure this cancellation. We propose a conservative propagator prescription which realises both cancellations leading to a physically sensible answer. All available low-velocity checks of our result against the post-Newtonian literature are satisfied.

Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order

Abstract

Using the worldline quantum field theory formalism, we compute the conservative scattering angle and impulse for classical black hole scattering at fifth post-Minkowskian (5PM) order by providing the second self-force (2SF) contributions. This four-loop calculation involves non-planar Feynman integrals and requires advanced integration-by-parts reduction, novel differential-equation strategies, and efficient boundary-integral algorithms to solve a system of hundreds of master integrals in four integral families on high-performance computing systems. The resulting function space includes multiple polylogarithms as well as iterated integrals with a K3 period, which generate a spurious velocity divergence at . This divergence is present in the potential region and must be canceled by contributions from the radiative memory region, while its dimensional-regularisation pole should cancel against the radiative tail region. We find that the standard use of Feynman propagators to access the conservative sector fails to ensure this cancellation. We propose a conservative propagator prescription which realises both cancellations leading to a physically sensible answer. All available low-velocity checks of our result against the post-Newtonian literature are satisfied.
Paper Structure (1 section, 28 equations, 5 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 1 section, 28 equations, 5 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: The 14 top-level sectors of the four-loop 2SF integral families: Planar P (a-g), extended planar PX1 (h-i) and PX2 (j), and the non-planar NP (k-m). Solid lines denote worldline propagators, $(v_{i}\cdot \ell+\mathrm{i} 0^{+})^{-1}$, wavy lines graviton propagators, $(\ell^{2}+\mathrm{i} 0^{+})^{-1}$, and the dotted lines may be interpreted as a cut worldline propagator, $\delta\!\!\!{}^-\!(\ell\cdot v_{i})$. In that sense, the top-level sectors have 13 propagators, and red graviton propagators may go on-shell. Finally, $q^{\mu}$ is the total momentum transfer.
  • Figure 2: Non-zero entries of the $321\times 321$ DE matrix $A(x)$ of the planar family (P). The solid blocks on the diagonals determine the function spaces of CY3 (blue), K3 (orange), and polylogarithmic (green) type. The off-diagonal entries are in corresponding lighter colours.
  • Figure 3: Active gravitons that become radiative (red) determine the three regions for a planar topsector and yield the required boundary integrals. In the tail and memory region, the $\mathrm{i} 0^{+}$ prescription is crucial.
  • Figure 4: The 5PM-2SF contribution to the scattering angle, $\theta^{(5,2)}_{\text{cons}}(\gamma)$: Potential and memory contributions both diverge for $\gamma \rightarrow 3$. These divergences cancel for the full result if one uses Eq. \ref{['eq:I12']} irrespective of the value of $c_{M}$, which is set to 1 for this plot.
  • Figure 5: The $\gamma$-$3$ prescription is given as the average of the two shown causality routings. In the first diagram retarded propagators meet in the symmetric point of the three-graviton interaction, and in the second, they are taken as advanced propagators.