Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Fair sampling with temperature-targeted QAOA based on quantum-classical correspondence theory

Tetsuro Abe, Shu Tanaka

Abstract

In combinatorial optimization problems with degenerate ground states, fair sampling of degenerate solutions is essential. However, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) with a standard transverse-field mixer induces biases among degenerate states as circuit depth increases. Based on quantum-classical correspondence theory, we propose SBO-QAOA, which employs a temperature-dependent Hamiltonian encoding a Gibbs distribution as its ground state. Numerical simulations show that, unlike standard QAOA, SBO-QAOA yields ground-state probabilities converging to finite-temperature values with uniform distribution among degenerate states. These fairness and temperature-targeting properties are preserved even with only four variational parameters under a linear schedule.

Fair sampling with temperature-targeted QAOA based on quantum-classical correspondence theory

Abstract

In combinatorial optimization problems with degenerate ground states, fair sampling of degenerate solutions is essential. However, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) with a standard transverse-field mixer induces biases among degenerate states as circuit depth increases. Based on quantum-classical correspondence theory, we propose SBO-QAOA, which employs a temperature-dependent Hamiltonian encoding a Gibbs distribution as its ground state. Numerical simulations show that, unlike standard QAOA, SBO-QAOA yields ground-state probabilities converging to finite-temperature values with uniform distribution among degenerate states. These fairness and temperature-targeting properties are preserved even with only four variational parameters under a linear schedule.
Paper Structure (1 section, 10 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 1 section, 10 equations, 3 figures.

Table of Contents

  1. Acknowledgments

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: (Color online) The structure of the 5-spin toy model used in the numerical simulation. The nodes represent spins, and the edges represent interactions. Blue solid lines indicate ferromagnetic interactions ($J_{ij} =+1$), and red dashed lines indicate antiferromagnetic interactions ($J_{ij} = -1$). The competition between these interactions induces frustration, resulting in a six-fold ground-state degeneracy.
  • Figure 2: (Color online) Dependence of the ground-state probability on the circuit depth $p$. (a) full-parameter QAOA, (b) linearized QAOA, (c) full-parameter SBO-QAOA, and (d) linearized SBO-QAOA. The probability of each state-pair (state-pair 1–3) and the total ground-state probability $P_{\mathrm{GS}}$ are plotted.
  • Figure 3: (Color online) Dependence of the total variation distance $D_{\mathrm{TVD}}$ between the final distribution $P_p(\sigma)$ and the target Gibbs distribution $P_{\mathrm{Gibbs}}(\sigma)$ on the circuit depth $p$. (a) Full-parameter SBO-QAOA and (b) linearized SBO-QAOA. Different curves correspond to different temperatures $T$.