Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Synthetic Differential Jet Bundles are Reduced

Grigorios Giotopoulos, Igor Khavkine, Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber

TL;DR

Problem: In synthetic differential geometry jet bundles are classically defined as projective limits in Fréchet manifolds, and it remained unclear whether the inclusion $i_!$ to formal smooth sets preserves these limits. Method: The authors prove the main theorem $i_! \\varprojlim_k J^k_\\Sigma E \\simeq \\varprojlim_k (i_! J^k_\\Sigma E)$ for finite-dimensional surjective submersions, showing the synthetic limit $\\mathbf{R}^\\infty := \\varprojlim_k i_! \\mathbb{R}^k$ is reduced and developing a staged constructive factorization argument to fill commuting diagrams through Cartesian spaces, then extending from $U = \\ast$, $\\mathbb{D} = \\mathbb{D}^1(1)$ to general $U$ and $\\mathbb{D}$. Contributions: Theorem i!PreservesInfiniteJetBundles provides a canonical isomorphism and the corollary MapsOutOfJetBundleAreLocallyOfFiniteOrder, linking SDG jet theory to maps locally of finite jet order. Significance: This solidifies the SDG formulation of diffieties and jet bundles in the Cahiers topos and has potential impact on variational calculus and Lagrangian field theory by connecting Fréchet-limit constructions with formal smooth-set perspectives.

Abstract

We have previously observed that the theory of solutions of partial differential equations, regarded as diffieties inside jet bundles, acquires a powerful comonadic formulation after passage from the category of Fréchet smooth manifolds to the Cahiers topos of formal smooth sets (a well-adapted model for Synthetic Differential Geometry). However, the tacit assumption that this passage preserves the projective limits that define infinite jet bundles had remained unproven. Here we provide a detailed proof.

Synthetic Differential Jet Bundles are Reduced

TL;DR

Problem: In synthetic differential geometry jet bundles are classically defined as projective limits in Fréchet manifolds, and it remained unclear whether the inclusion to formal smooth sets preserves these limits. Method: The authors prove the main theorem for finite-dimensional surjective submersions, showing the synthetic limit is reduced and developing a staged constructive factorization argument to fill commuting diagrams through Cartesian spaces, then extending from , to general and . Contributions: Theorem i!PreservesInfiniteJetBundles provides a canonical isomorphism and the corollary MapsOutOfJetBundleAreLocallyOfFiniteOrder, linking SDG jet theory to maps locally of finite jet order. Significance: This solidifies the SDG formulation of diffieties and jet bundles in the Cahiers topos and has potential impact on variational calculus and Lagrangian field theory by connecting Fréchet-limit constructions with formal smooth-set perspectives.

Abstract

We have previously observed that the theory of solutions of partial differential equations, regarded as diffieties inside jet bundles, acquires a powerful comonadic formulation after passage from the category of Fréchet smooth manifolds to the Cahiers topos of formal smooth sets (a well-adapted model for Synthetic Differential Geometry). However, the tacit assumption that this passage preserves the projective limits that define infinite jet bundles had remained unproven. Here we provide a detailed proof.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 14 theorems, 36 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 14 theorems, 36 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

[theorem]i!PreservesInfiniteJetBundles For \begin{tikzcd}[sep=small, ampersand replacement=\&]E \ar[r] \& \Sigma\end{tikzcd} a finite-dimensional surjective submersion of smooth manifolds, passage to formal smooth sets preserves the projective limit involved in forming its infinite jet bundle $J^\in

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Corollary 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.5
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['i!PreservesInfiniteJetBundles']}
  • Remark 2.7
  • ...and 22 more