Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$C^\ast$-extreme points of unital completely positive maps invariant under group action

Chaitanya J. Kulkarni

TL;DR

This work analyzes unital completely positive maps from a unital C*-algebra 𝔄 to ℬ(ℋ) that are invariant under a group action τ. Framing the invariant maps within the C*-convexity paradigm, the authors develop a Radon–Nikodym-type theory and obtain both sufficient and necessary conditions for C*-extremality, including a two-term decomposition and a phi-invertible operator criterion. They provide a complete characterization of the C*-extreme points and establish a Krein–Milman type theorem showing that the invariant CP maps are the BW-closure of the C*-convex hull of their C*-extreme points under suitable hypotheses. The results extend the noncommutative convexity theory for CP maps to the setting of group-invariant maps and yield structural insight into ergodic-type decompositions of invariant maps.

Abstract

In this work, we study a sub-collection of unital completely positive maps from a unital $C^\ast$-algebra $\mathcal{A}$ to $\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H})$, the algebra of bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ in the setting of $C^\ast$-convexity. Let $τ$ be an action of a group $G$ on the $C^\ast$-algebra $\mathcal{A}$ through $C^\ast$-automorphisms. We focus our attention to the set of all unital completely positive maps from $\mathcal{A}$ to $\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H})$, which remain invariant under $τ$. We denote this collection by the notation $\text{UCP}^{G_τ} \big(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H} ) \big)$. This collection forms a $C^\ast$-convex set. We characterize the set of $C^\ast$-extreme points of $\text{UCP}^{G_τ} \big(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H} ) \big)$. Further, we conclude the article by proving the Krein--Milman type theorem in the setting of $C^\ast$-convexity for the set $\text{UCP}^{G_τ} \big(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} (\mathcal{H} ) \big)$.

$C^\ast$-extreme points of unital completely positive maps invariant under group action

TL;DR

This work analyzes unital completely positive maps from a unital C*-algebra 𝔄 to ℬ(ℋ) that are invariant under a group action τ. Framing the invariant maps within the C*-convexity paradigm, the authors develop a Radon–Nikodym-type theory and obtain both sufficient and necessary conditions for C*-extremality, including a two-term decomposition and a phi-invertible operator criterion. They provide a complete characterization of the C*-extreme points and establish a Krein–Milman type theorem showing that the invariant CP maps are the BW-closure of the C*-convex hull of their C*-extreme points under suitable hypotheses. The results extend the noncommutative convexity theory for CP maps to the setting of group-invariant maps and yield structural insight into ergodic-type decompositions of invariant maps.

Abstract

In this work, we study a sub-collection of unital completely positive maps from a unital -algebra to , the algebra of bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space in the setting of -convexity. Let be an action of a group on the -algebra through -automorphisms. We focus our attention to the set of all unital completely positive maps from to , which remain invariant under . We denote this collection by the notation . This collection forms a -convex set. We characterize the set of -extreme points of . Further, we conclude the article by proving the Krein--Milman type theorem in the setting of -convexity for the set .
Paper Structure (6 sections, 11 theorems, 79 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 11 theorems, 79 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a unital $C^\ast$-algebra and $\mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space. Let $\phi : \mathcal{A} \rightarrow \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H})$ be a completely positive map. Then there exists a Hilbert space $\mathcal{K}$, a bounded linear map $V : \mathcal{H} \rightarrow \mathcal{K}$, and a unit Moreover, the set $\{ \pi(a)Vh : a \in \mathcal{A}, \; h \in \mathcal{H} \}$ spans a dense subspac

Theorems & Definitions (24)

  • Theorem 2.1: Paulsen
  • Proposition 2.2: Paulsen
  • Theorem 2.3: Arveson1
  • Remark 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5: BK3
  • Example 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Definition 3.3
  • Proposition 3.4
  • ...and 14 more