Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The paper "On the constant in a transference inequality for the vector-valued Fourier transform" revisited

Dion Gijswijt. Jan van Neerven

TL;DR

The paper provides a streamlined proof that, for every $r\geq 1$, the finite-sum function $f_r(x)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}} \left|\frac{\sin(\pi(x+m))}{\pi(x+m)}\right|^{2r}$ on $[0,1]$ attains a global minimum at $x=\tfrac{1}{2}$. Building on the $r=1$ identity $\sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}} h(x+m)=1$ and Parseval via the Fourier kernel $g_x(t)=e^{2\pi i x t}$, the authors relate $f_r$ to convex sums of $s_m(x)=h(x+m)+h(x-(m+1))$. A central one-crossing lemma yields convex-dominance under mass transfers, with the crucial fact that $s_0(x)$ minimizes at $x=\tfrac{1}{2}$ and $s_m(x)$ ($m\geq 1$) maximizes there, enabling the comparison $\sum_{m\ge0} x_m^r \geq \sum_{m\ge0} y_m^r$ and thus $f_r(x)\geq f_r(\tfrac{1}{2})$. The result simplifies a known argument, providing a shorter, more direct route to the minimum-location claim and reinforcing the connection between transference-type constants and their one-dimensional minimizers.

Abstract

The standard proof of the equivalence of Fourier type on \(\mathbb R^d\) and on the torus \(\mathbb T^d\) is usually stated in terms of an implicit constant which can be expressed in terms of the global minimiser of the functions \[f_r(x)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}}\left|\frac{\sin(π(x+m))}{π(x+m)}\right|^{2r},\qquad x\in [0,1], \ r\ge 1.\] The aim of this note is to provide a short proof of a result of the authors which states that each \(f_r\) takes a global minimum at the point \(x = \frac12\).

The paper "On the constant in a transference inequality for the vector-valued Fourier transform" revisited

TL;DR

The paper provides a streamlined proof that, for every , the finite-sum function on attains a global minimum at . Building on the identity and Parseval via the Fourier kernel , the authors relate to convex sums of . A central one-crossing lemma yields convex-dominance under mass transfers, with the crucial fact that minimizes at and () maximizes there, enabling the comparison and thus . The result simplifies a known argument, providing a shorter, more direct route to the minimum-location claim and reinforcing the connection between transference-type constants and their one-dimensional minimizers.

Abstract

The standard proof of the equivalence of Fourier type on and on the torus is usually stated in terms of an implicit constant which can be expressed in terms of the global minimiser of the functions \[f_r(x)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}}\left|\frac{\sin(π(x+m))}{π(x+m)}\right|^{2r},\qquad x\in [0,1], \ r\ge 1.\] The aim of this note is to provide a short proof of a result of the authors which states that each takes a global minimum at the point .
Paper Structure (1 section, 5 theorems, 31 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 1 section, 5 theorems, 31 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Proposition 1

For every real number $r\geqslant 1$, the function $f_r:[0,1]\to\mathbbm{R}$ has a global minimum at $x=\tfrac{1}{2}$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: A plot of $f_r$, where $r=1.02^{k}$ for $k=1,2,4,\dots,256$.

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Proposition 1
  • Lemma 1.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 1.2: One-crossing implies convex dominance
  • proof
  • Lemma 1.3
  • Lemma 1.4
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Proposition \ref{['prop']}