Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Non-Hydrodynamic Solutions to the linear Density-dependent BGK equation

Florian Kogelbauer

TL;DR

This work investigates the linear density-dependent BGK equation in $d$ dimensions to distinguish hydrodynamic and non-hydrodynamic regimes. It combines spectral analysis of the BGK operator with an explicit Laplace–Fourier solution to obtain a time-domain formula for the macroscopic density, revealing a critical wave number $k_c = \frac{1}{\tau}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}$ that separates regimes. For $|k|<k_c$ the macroscopic dissipation follows Chapman--Enskog scaling, yielding $\Delta[\hat{\rho}](k,t,\tau) \sim \tau |k|^2$ as $\tau\to0$, while for $|k|\ge k_c$ the dynamics are governed by the essential spectrum and produce a dissipation $\Delta[\hat{\rho}](k,t,\tau) \sim \frac{Z'(\hat{\zeta}_\beta)}{\tau}$ (with $\beta=\tau|k|$ and $Z(\hat{\zeta}_\beta)=i\beta$), causing a $1/\tau$ divergence. These results demonstrate non-hydrodynamic exact solutions and highlight the nonuniform nature of hydrodynamic limits, with implications for how Closures and reduced-order models may fail to capture certain fast kinetic fluctuations.

Abstract

We prove the existence of non-hydrodynamic solutions to the linear density-dependent BGK equation in $d$ dimensions. Specifically, we show the existence of an initial condition for any Knudsen number $τ$ for which the dissipation rate of the macroscopic mass density diverges $\sim 1/τ$. Our results rely on a detailed spectral analysis of the linear BGK operator, an explicit solution formula for the time-dependent problem using a combination of Fourier series with the Laplace transform and subsequent contour integration arguments from complex analysis.

Non-Hydrodynamic Solutions to the linear Density-dependent BGK equation

TL;DR

This work investigates the linear density-dependent BGK equation in dimensions to distinguish hydrodynamic and non-hydrodynamic regimes. It combines spectral analysis of the BGK operator with an explicit Laplace–Fourier solution to obtain a time-domain formula for the macroscopic density, revealing a critical wave number that separates regimes. For the macroscopic dissipation follows Chapman--Enskog scaling, yielding as , while for the dynamics are governed by the essential spectrum and produce a dissipation (with and ), causing a divergence. These results demonstrate non-hydrodynamic exact solutions and highlight the nonuniform nature of hydrodynamic limits, with implications for how Closures and reduced-order models may fail to capture certain fast kinetic fluctuations.

Abstract

We prove the existence of non-hydrodynamic solutions to the linear density-dependent BGK equation in dimensions. Specifically, we show the existence of an initial condition for any Knudsen number for which the dissipation rate of the macroscopic mass density diverges . Our results rely on a detailed spectral analysis of the linear BGK operator, an explicit solution formula for the time-dependent problem using a combination of Fourier series with the Laplace transform and subsequent contour integration arguments from complex analysis.
Paper Structure (18 sections, 1 theorem, 89 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 18 sections, 1 theorem, 89 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 3.2

Define the critical wave number as and consider the initial condition for some amplitude $A>0$ and some frequency $k_0\in\mathbb{Z}^d$. There exist two separate scaling regimes for equation maineqfrequency: In particular, for every Knudsen number $\tau$, there exists a solution to maineq whose dissipation rate of the mass density is or order $\tau^{-1}$.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The integration contour $\Gamma_S$, contained in the upper half-plane, encircling the zero $\hat{\zeta}$ once in the positive direction.
  • Figure 2: The function $y\mapsto \mathrm{i} Z(\mathrm{i} y)$ (black solid) together with its asymptotics $y\mapsto -2\sqrt{\pi/2}e^{y^2/2}$ (red dashed).
  • Figure 3: The integration contour $\tilde{\Gamma}_S$, contained in the lower half-plane, encircling the zero $\hat{\zeta}_{\beta}$ once in the negative direction.

Theorems & Definitions (6)

  • Remark 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2: Hydrodynamic Versus Non-Hydrodynamic Solutions
  • Remark 3.3
  • Remark 3.4
  • Remark 3.5
  • Remark 3.6