Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Coloring small locally sparse degenerate graphs and related problems

Domagoj Bradač, Jacob Fox, Raphael Steiner, Benny Sudakov, Shengtong Zhang

TL;DR

This work analyzes how small, locally sparse, d-degenerate graphs behave under coloring constraints when large cliques are forbidden. It introduces a sampling-based framework to bound the chromatic number of triangle-free d-degenerate graphs with relatively few vertices, linking f(d)—the smallest order of a triangle-free d-degenerate (d+1)-chromatic graph—to the online-chromatic number g(n) and to improved bounds on online coloring for K_r-free graphs. The authors establish exponential lower and upper bounds on f(d) and prove new upper bounds for χ in sparse settings, plus an enhanced upper bound for g_r(n). They also construct d-degenerate K_r-free graphs with large fractional chromatic number, disproving a direct Harris-type extension, and derive Hadwiger-type consequences, Ramsey-structural statements, and corollaries for hereditary classes and beyond-planar graphs, while outlining several compelling open problems for future research.

Abstract

The classic upper bound on the chromatic number of $d$-degenerate graphs is $d+1$, shown to be tight by complete graphs. A natural question is whether this bound remains tight if one forbids large cliques. Classic constructions of Tutte and Zykov from the early 50s show that there exist $d$-degenerate $(d+1)$-chromatic graphs that are triangle-free, however these constructions grow rapidly with $d$. Motivated by this and addressing a problem posed by the second author at the Oberwolfach Graph Theory workshop, we prove that the minimum order $f(d)$ of a $d$-degenerate triangle-free graph of chromatic number $d+1$ satisfies $e^{Ω(d)}\le f(d)\le e^{O(d^2\log d)}.$ The lower bound follows from a novel upper bound on the chromatic number of triangle-free graphs: Every triangle-free $d$-degenerate graph $G$ on $n \le e^{O(d)}$ vertices satisfies $$χ(G)\le O\left(\frac{d}{\log\left(d/\log n\right)}\right).$$ We extend this to a more general result about degenerate graphs with sparse neighborhoods, which has applications to many graph coloring problems: For example, we prove that every counterexample to Hadwiger's conjecture with parameter $t$ must have a complete bipartite subgraph with one exponentially large side ($K_{a,b}$ where $a=(\log t)^{1/2-o(1)}$ and $b=e^{t^{1-o(1)}}$) or a small and very dense subgraph (of order $\le t$ with $t^{2-o(1)}$ edges) in some neighborhood. For the upper bound on $f(d)$ we establish a surprising connection between $f(d)$ and the on-line-chromatic number $g(n)$ of $n$-vertex triangle-free graphs. We also give an asymptotic improvement of the previous best upper bound for $g(n)$ due to Lovász, Saks and Trotter from 1989. Along the way we disprove a generalization of Harris' fractional coloring conjecture to graphs of bounded clique number and raise numerous problems which open up interesting directions to explore for future research.

Coloring small locally sparse degenerate graphs and related problems

TL;DR

This work analyzes how small, locally sparse, d-degenerate graphs behave under coloring constraints when large cliques are forbidden. It introduces a sampling-based framework to bound the chromatic number of triangle-free d-degenerate graphs with relatively few vertices, linking f(d)—the smallest order of a triangle-free d-degenerate (d+1)-chromatic graph—to the online-chromatic number g(n) and to improved bounds on online coloring for K_r-free graphs. The authors establish exponential lower and upper bounds on f(d) and prove new upper bounds for χ in sparse settings, plus an enhanced upper bound for g_r(n). They also construct d-degenerate K_r-free graphs with large fractional chromatic number, disproving a direct Harris-type extension, and derive Hadwiger-type consequences, Ramsey-structural statements, and corollaries for hereditary classes and beyond-planar graphs, while outlining several compelling open problems for future research.

Abstract

The classic upper bound on the chromatic number of -degenerate graphs is , shown to be tight by complete graphs. A natural question is whether this bound remains tight if one forbids large cliques. Classic constructions of Tutte and Zykov from the early 50s show that there exist -degenerate -chromatic graphs that are triangle-free, however these constructions grow rapidly with . Motivated by this and addressing a problem posed by the second author at the Oberwolfach Graph Theory workshop, we prove that the minimum order of a -degenerate triangle-free graph of chromatic number satisfies The lower bound follows from a novel upper bound on the chromatic number of triangle-free graphs: Every triangle-free -degenerate graph on vertices satisfies We extend this to a more general result about degenerate graphs with sparse neighborhoods, which has applications to many graph coloring problems: For example, we prove that every counterexample to Hadwiger's conjecture with parameter must have a complete bipartite subgraph with one exponentially large side ( where and ) or a small and very dense subgraph (of order with edges) in some neighborhood. For the upper bound on we establish a surprising connection between and the on-line-chromatic number of -vertex triangle-free graphs. We also give an asymptotic improvement of the previous best upper bound for due to Lovász, Saks and Trotter from 1989. Along the way we disprove a generalization of Harris' fractional coloring conjecture to graphs of bounded clique number and raise numerous problems which open up interesting directions to explore for future research.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 28 theorems, 75 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 28 theorems, 75 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

There are absolute constants $c,C >0$ such that the following holds. Let $d\in \mathbb{R}_{\ge 1}$ and let $G$ be a triangle-free $d$-degenerate graph on $n \le 2^{cd}$ vertices. Then

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Proposition 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Corollary 1.6
  • Corollary 1.7
  • Corollary 1.8
  • Corollary 1.9
  • ...and 39 more