Improved GPR-Based CSI Acquisition via Spatial-Correlation Kernel
Syed Luqman Shah, Nurul Huda Mahmood, Italo Atzeni
TL;DR
This work tackles the problem of accurate CSI acquisition under reduced pilot overhead in MIMO systems. It introduces a Spatial-correlation (SC) kernel for Gaussian process regression that encodes the channel's second-order statistics, yielding a closed-form, MMSE-optimal posterior mean without assuming Gaussian channel distributions and without hyperparameter learning. Numerical results show that SC-GPR achieves lower NMSE and better spectral efficiency than learning-based GPR and LS/MMSE across separable and non-separable covariance models, even with up to 75% pilot reduction, while maintaining calibrated uncertainty and reduced computational burden. The approach thus offers a physics-/geometry-aware, uncertainty-aware, and scalable solution for efficient CSI estimation in next-generation wireless systems.
Abstract
Accurate channel estimation with low pilot overhead and computational complexity is key to efficiently utilizing multi-antenna wireless systems. Motivated by the evolution from purely statistical descriptions toward physics- and geometry-aware propagation models, this work focuses on incorporating channel information into a Gaussian process regression (GPR) framework for improving the channel estimation accuracy. In this work, we propose a GPR-based channel estimation framework along with a novel Spatial-correlation (SC) kernel that explicitly captures the channel's second-order statistics. We derive a closed-form expression of the proposed SC-based GPR estimator and prove that its posterior mean is optimal in terms of minimum mean-square error (MMSE) under the same second-order statistics, without requiring the underlying channel distribution to be Gaussian. Our analysis reveals that, with up to 50% pilot overhead reduction, the proposed method achieves the lowest normalized mean-square error, the highest empirical 95% credible-interval coverage, and superior preservation of spectral efficiency compared to benchmark estimators, while maintaining lower computational complexity than the conventional MMSE estimator.
