Table of Contents
Fetching ...

XPE and VLT /FORS2 polarimetry challenge the Seyfert-1.9 classification of MCG-05-23-16

Frédéric Marin, Daniele Tagliacozzo, Francesco Ursini, Damien Hutsemékers, Mitsuru Kokubo, Thibault Barnouin, Andrea Gnarini, Alessandro Leonardo Lai, Jirí Svoboda, Stefano Bianchi, Vittoria Elvezia Gianolli, Ephraim Gau, Kun Hu, Henric Krawczynski, W. Peter Maksym, Andrea Marinucci, Herman Marshall, Giorgio Matt, Riccardo Middei, Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, Simonetta Puccetti, Nicole Rodriguez, Roberto Serafinelli, Francesco Tombesi

Abstract

We report the third observation of the Seyfert-1.9 active galactic nucleus (AGN) MCG-05-23-16 with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (\textit{IXPE}), together with optical spectro-polarimetry obtained at the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and combined with archival near-ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared polarimetric data. No X-ray polarization was detected in the 2-8 keV band, with a 99\% confidence upper limit of $\leq$2.9\%, further reduced to $\leq$2.5\% when combined with the two past IXPE observations of the same target. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that equatorial coronal models are disfavored if the AGN is indeed a type-1.9/2 AGN, but coronae coplanar to the accretion disk remain consistent if the source is less inclined than previously assumed. \textit{VLT}/FORS2 data reveal a typical type-2 spectrum in total flux, a broad H$α$ line in polarized flux, and strongly wavelength dependent polarization degree and angle, rotating by nearly 70$^\circ$ across the optical band. Comparison with historical measurements confirms long-term stability of the polarization spectrum and a $\sim$90$^\circ$ rotation in the near-ultraviolet. Interpreting the multi-wavelength polarization relative to the AGN ionization axis indicates that the main obscurer is not a compact circumnuclear torus, but a distant kpc-scale dust lane crossing the galaxy. This result implies that MCG-05-23-16 is in fact a type-1 AGN seen through foreground dust. The low X-ray column density becomes consistent with the absence of polarization, provided that the nuclear inclination is low.

XPE and VLT /FORS2 polarimetry challenge the Seyfert-1.9 classification of MCG-05-23-16

Abstract

We report the third observation of the Seyfert-1.9 active galactic nucleus (AGN) MCG-05-23-16 with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (\textit{IXPE}), together with optical spectro-polarimetry obtained at the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and combined with archival near-ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared polarimetric data. No X-ray polarization was detected in the 2-8 keV band, with a 99\% confidence upper limit of 2.9\%, further reduced to 2.5\% when combined with the two past IXPE observations of the same target. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that equatorial coronal models are disfavored if the AGN is indeed a type-1.9/2 AGN, but coronae coplanar to the accretion disk remain consistent if the source is less inclined than previously assumed. \textit{VLT}/FORS2 data reveal a typical type-2 spectrum in total flux, a broad H line in polarized flux, and strongly wavelength dependent polarization degree and angle, rotating by nearly 70 across the optical band. Comparison with historical measurements confirms long-term stability of the polarization spectrum and a 90 rotation in the near-ultraviolet. Interpreting the multi-wavelength polarization relative to the AGN ionization axis indicates that the main obscurer is not a compact circumnuclear torus, but a distant kpc-scale dust lane crossing the galaxy. This result implies that MCG-05-23-16 is in fact a type-1 AGN seen through foreground dust. The low X-ray column density becomes consistent with the absence of polarization, provided that the nuclear inclination is low.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 11 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 14 sections, 11 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Left panel:IXPE$Q$ (orange crosses) and $U$ (magenta crosses) grouped Stokes spectra of the 3rd IXPE pointing (April 2025) of MCG-05-23-16 are shown with residuals, along with the corresponding best-fitting model. Right panel: contour plot between the polarization degree $P$ and angle $\theta$, summed over the $2-8$ keV energy band of the 3rd IXPE pointing. Purple, pink and orange regions correspond, respectively, to $68\%$, $90\%$ and $99\%$ confidence levels for two parameters of interest.
  • Figure 2: $P$, $\theta$ contour plots of the May 2022 observation (dotted contours), May 2022 + November 2022 (dashed contours), May 2022 + November 2022 + April 2025 (solid contours). Contours colors are as in Fig. \ref{['Fig:3rdobs']}.
  • Figure 3: NuSTAR, XMM and IXPE I spectra, collected on May 2022, November 2022 and April 2025 of MCG-05-23-16, along with the best-fit model components for each instrument (only for the May 2022 campaign, in which the source was observed by the three instruments simultaneously) and the residuals for the broad-band (2--79 keV) spectral analysis in Sec. \ref{['Results:Broadband']}. NuSTAR photon counting detector modules (FPMA and FPMB) of the same campaign have been grouped for visual clarity, as well as IXPE DUs.
  • Figure 4: Same as in Fig. \ref{['Fig:all_nopol']}, but with compTT (assuming a slab coronal configuration) instead of cutoffpl.
  • Figure 5: Polarization degree from the MONK simulations as a function of the cosine of the system inclination angle $\cos(\theta_{\rm disk})$ in the case of a spherical lamppost model (left panel), a conical outflows model (middle panel) and a slab corona model (right panel). $\cos(\theta_{\rm disk})=0$ and $\cos(\theta_{\rm disk})=1$ represent the edge-on and face-on views of the source, respectively. The green regions represent the allowed values of the polarization degree: pale green represents the constraint on $P$ found with the broad-band spectro-polarimetric analysis in Sect. \ref{['Results:Broadband_pol']}, while saturated green represents the combination of the constraints on $P$ and the system inclination (Sect. \ref{['Discussion:orientation']}). Since the lamppost and the cone result in $\theta$ perpendicular to the accretion disk axis, the resulting polarization constraint is set to $P<1.1\%$ in the left and middle panels. Conversely, the slab results in $\theta$ parallel to the disk. In that case $P<2.4\%$.
  • ...and 6 more figures